DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. Meienberg, 156 P.3d 1149.

185 citing documents.

  • Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Matthews v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).
  • Sw Fabrication v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Sw Fabrication v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 (App. 2007).
  • Faries v. Faries, II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Faries v. Faries, II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Symons v. Pjo Insurance Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Symons v. Pjo Insurance Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Bowles v. Trznadel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Bowles v. Trznadel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    A court abuses its discretion when it commits an error of law or fails to consider evidence in reaching a discretionary conclusion or if, upon review, “the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).
  • Munguia v. Cramer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Munguia v. Cramer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    We review the denial of a motion for new trial based on the verdict being against the weight of the evidence for an abuse of discretion, ¶ 25 (App. 2007), which occurs when “the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding,” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (citation omitted).
  • Coburn v. Rhodig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Coburn v. Rhodig Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Gainey Ranch v. Kraft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • Gainey Ranch v. Kraft Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 (App. 2007); see also De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir. 1990).
  • Savage v. Crippa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Savage v. Crippa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Brumley v. Brumley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Brumley v. Brumley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Price v. Price Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Price v. Price Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding.'" Schickner v. Schickner, 237 4 PRICE v. PRICE Decision of the Court Ariz. 194, 197, ¶ 13 (App. 2015) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App.2007)).
  • Lamb v. Nielsen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Lamb v. Nielsen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Moran v. Moran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Moran v. Moran Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Schickner v. Schickner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Schickner v. Schickner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    (citing Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
  • Whitestone v. Jade Palace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Whitestone v. Jade Palace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    A court abuses its discretion when it commits an error of law or fails to consider evidence in reaching a discretionary conclusion or, if upon review, “the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Rotalo v. Sahd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Rotalo v. Sahd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    A court abuses its discretion when it commits an error of law or fails to consider evidence in reaching a discretionary conclusion or if “the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Nevens Ex Rel. Hardt v. AZHH, LLC 397 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    And even when a ruling is discretionary, “[a] court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Willis v. Dentists Benefits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Willis v. Dentists Benefits Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 (App. 2007) (citation omitted); see De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir. 1990) (citations omitted) (“We review the district court’s vexatious litigant order for an abuse of discretion.”).
  • Evers v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • Evers v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    4 EVERS v. ROSE Decision of the Court considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide the substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
  • Marriage of Henderson v. Henderson 390 P.3d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
  • Marriage of Henderson v. Henderson 390 P.3d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
    Moreover, even were we to conclude the trial court did commit legal error and thereby abused its discretion by misapplying the fee-shifting statutes, see Flying Diamond Airpark, , (legal error constitutes abuse of discretion), attorney fees are awardable under UIF-SA, see § 25-1253, and we will uphold a trial court's decision if correct for any reason
  • White Mountain Health Center, Inc. v. Maricopa County 386 P.3d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • White Mountain Health Center, Inc. v. Maricopa County 386 P.3d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 , (injunctive relief); ¶ 9 , (mandamus relief); ¶ 5 , (noting federal preemption is a question of law); ¶¶ 17, 19 , 290
  • Kulpins v. Weaver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Kulpins v. Weaver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    A superior court abuses its discretion when it commits an error of law or fails to consider evidence in reaching a discretionary conclusion, commits some other substantial error of law, or if, upon review, “the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • Kimberly McLaughlin v. Suzan McLaughlin 382 P.3d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
  • Kimberly McLaughlin v. Suzan McLaughlin 382 P.3d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
  • Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp. 383 P.3d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp. 383 P.3d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (citations omitted).
  • Thienes v. City Center Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Thienes v. City Center Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9
  • Alvarado v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016