DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Odom v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona, 169 P.3d 120.

136 citing documents.

  • Garsha v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Pringle v. Mixon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.”).
  • Haarer v. Haarer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Haarer v. Haarer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Russ v. Tognetti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Russ v. Tognetti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“Generally, arguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed 4 RUSS v. TOGNETTI Decision of the Court waived.”); see also ARCAP 13(a)(7)(A) (argument must contain citations of
  • Jackman v. McCann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Jackman v. McCann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Schooley v. pena/farmers 510 P.3d 522 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Schooley v. pena/farmers 510 P.3d 522 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.”).
  • Terry v. UPS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Terry v. UPS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.”); ¶ 27 (App 2014) (judicial estoppel prevents a party from taking different factual positions in different phases of litigation).
  • No Worries v. Marlin Mechanical Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • No Worries v. Marlin Mechanical Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007); ¶ 101 n.9 (2004).
  • Preszler v. Corwin D. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • Preszler v. Corwin D. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.”).
  • Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Perez v. Richardson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Perez v. Richardson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Borowsky v. Brooks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (noting arguments raised for the first time on appeal may be found waived).4 ¶26 Although Borowsky claims on appeal that there are disputed issues of material fact precluding summary judgment for Ms. Brooks, the time to present any such disputed facts was in his response to the motion
  • Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Moore v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Danko v. Dumas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Danko v. Dumas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.”).
  • Gaslight Inn v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Gaslight Inn v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Co. 7 GASLIGHT INN, et al. v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW, et al. Decision of the Court of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.”).
  • Vartanian v. Vartanian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Vartanian v. Vartanian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.”).
  • Mago v. Az Escrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Mago v. Az Escrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Andaloro v. Andaloro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • Andaloro v. Andaloro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Soetan v. Soetan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Soetan v. Soetan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.”).
  • Majerle v. Zimmerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Carpenter v. Carpenter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Carpenter v. Carpenter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Majerle v. Zimmerman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Reyes v. Reyes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Reyes v. Reyes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Gillette v. Arzola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Gillette v. Arzola Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“Generally, arguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.”).
  • State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007).
  • Campbell v. Murphy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Campbell v. Murphy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.”).
  • Cuen v. Cuen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Cuen v. Cuen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    Co. of Ariz., ¶ 18 (App. 2007) ("[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and deemed waived.").
  • O'Neal v. Corporation Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Wethe v. Wethe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020