Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corporation v. Nowak, Kniffen, Martell, 322 P.3d 204.

68 citing documents.

Kcaz v. Phoenix Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 13 (App. 2014) (citation modified), Restatement § 552 limits the “risk of liability to which [an information] supplier subjects himself” based on the “nature and extent” of the dissemination, including the “number and character of the persons” who receive the information, Restatement § 552 cmt.
Karolina Barrera v. Sedona Pointe LLC. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
Henderson v. Hon. moskowitz/sullivan Ariz. 2025
Henderson v. Hon. moskowitz/sullivan Ariz. 2025
¶ 19 (2014) (stating that interpretation of a contract is a question of law reviewed de novo); Taylor v. State Farm Mut.
Danko v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Danko v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-93, ¶¶ 17-18 (App. 2014) (affirming dismissal of complaint because facts alleged could not support finding of liability).
Hammer v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Hammer v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
JANE HM DOE v. THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF PHOENIX Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
JANE HM DOE v. THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF PHOENIX Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
so we address the argument.
Hiatt v. Hiatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Hiatt v. Hiatt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
John R. France v. Arizona Counties Insurance Pool Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
John R. France v. Arizona Counties Insurance Pool Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
Silverdove v. Greenbank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Silverdove v. Greenbank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Andrich v. Meyers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Andrich v. Meyers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ghb v. Solomon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Ghb v. Solomon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Neal v. Ruiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Neal v. Ruiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shepherd v. Costco 441 P.3d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Shepherd v. Costco 441 P.3d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Roi v. Ford 437 P.3d 890 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Roi v. Ford 437 P.3d 890 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State Bar v. Goodman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State Bar v. Goodman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gallardo v. West Sand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gallardo v. West Sand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 10 (App. 2014) (we may affirm if a dismissal is correct for any reason).
Stith v. Ensign Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Stith v. Ensign Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 21, n.7 (App. 2014) (appellate court may exercise its discretion when "issue can be resolved as a matter of law").
Doneson v. Farmers Ins. Exch. 431 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Doneson v. Farmers Ins. Exch. 431 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. Nowak , , ¶ 4
Spyropoulos v. Sherman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Spyropoulos v. Sherman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Broadband v. Satcom 418 P.3d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Broadband v. Satcom 418 P.3d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 10 (App. 2014), we decline to consider this issue because it was not addressed by the superior court and the facts are not sufficiently developed to permit a proper legal analysis.
Camelback v. Cbre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Camelback v. Cbre Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Corp. v. 5 -95, ¶¶ 27-30 (App. 2014).
Scorzo v. Az med/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Scorzo v. Az med/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ball v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ball v. Maricopa County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hackett v. Hackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hackett v. Hackett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mattison v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mattison v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
4 MATTISON v. SCOTTSDALE et al. Decision of the Court CONCLUSION ¶8 The trial court’s order granting the City’s motion to dismiss is affirmed.
Eden v. Show Low Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Eden v. Show Low Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 10, (this Court will affirm the dismissal of a complaint if the dismissal was correct for any reason).