Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Myrick v. Maloney, 333 P.3d 818.
- Lynch v. Brakebill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Lynch v. Brakebill
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Although we agree with Mother that “[t]he Guidelines do not declare that every capital gain is gross income for child support purposes,” ¶ 8, it is within the 7 LYNCH v. BRAKEBILL Decision of the Court discretion of the trial court to make the determination on a case-by-case basis.
- Jacobson v. Jacobson-Boettcher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Jacobson v. Jacobson-Boettcher
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 9, (“[A] disparity alone does not mandate an award of fees.
- Shurts v. Shurts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Shurts v. Shurts
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 9, see also Magee, 206 Ariz. at 593, ¶ 18, 81 P.3d at 1052.
- Robinson v. Hutchins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
Robinson v. Hutchins
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- 92, -87 (App. 1995), superseded in part by statute on other grounds as recognized in Myrick v. Maloney, ___ Ariz. ___