Cited by

3 CAMACHO v. BREWER Decision of the Court ¶9 As an initial matter, Camacho has not provided a transcript of the evidentiary hearing,2 and we “presume the items not included in the appellate record support a trial court’s ruling.” ¶ 11 (App. 2014).

¶ 20 (App. 2012); ¶ 10 (App. 2014) (superior court need not make findings under A.R.S.

¶ 16 (App. 2025) (child support order); ¶ 5 (App. 2021) (denial of motion to alter or amend); ¶ 6 (App. 2014) (attorneys’ fees).

See ARCAP 11(c); ¶ 11 (App. 2014).

¶ 11 (App. 2014); ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B).

¶ 11 (App. 2014) (citing cases).

¶19 “The general law in Arizona is that a party must timely present her legal theories to the trial court so as to give it an opportunity to rule properly.” ¶ 11 (App. 2014) (citation modified).

[A] trial court has the discretion to deny a fee request even after considering both statutory factors.” ¶ 9 (App. 2014).

See ARCAP 11(c)(1)(B); ¶ 11 (App. 2014).

¶ 11 (App. 2014) (citing cases).