Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., 735 P.2d 1373.

52 citing documents.

Beasterfield v. Del Bosque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Beasterfield v. Del Bosque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶ 16 (App. 2009); see also Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., (“The trial court is not bound to accept as true the uncontradicted testimony of an interested party.”).
Duran v. Terrones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Duran v. Terrones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶ 16 (App. 2009) (appellate court defers to trial court’s credibility determinations and the weight to give conflicting evidence); see also Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., (trial court is not bound to accept the uncontradicted testimony of an interested party).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
However, the court did not have to accept his unsupported testimony, see Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., and Father admitted he did not send any gifts or monetary support to Mother or A.F.
Bernardino v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Bernardino v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.
Hovda v. Hovda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Hovda v. Hovda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
But the superior court “is not bound to accept as true the uncontradicted testimony of an interested party.” Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.
Moyer v. Moyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Moyer v. Moyer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., (noting courts are not bound to accept as true the uncontradicted testimony of an interested party).
State v. Denslow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Denslow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(witness credibility is for the superior court, not the appellate courts); Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., ("The trial court is not bound to accept as true the uncontradicted testimony of an interested party.").
Stickler v. Stickler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Stickler v. Stickler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Compare Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., (Courts are “not bound to accept as true the uncontradicted testimony of an interested party.”), with Fort Mohave Farms, (“[W]here testimony of an interested witness is corroborated by a disinterested witness, rejection of that evidence amounts to arbitrary act
Potter v. Potter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Potter v. Potter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
See Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., (“The trial court is not bound to accept as true the uncontradicted testimony of an interested party.”).
Maurice N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Maurice N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., 735 11 Although Father argues that DCS’s requirement that he provide DCS with a lease or other proof of stable housing is “devoid of any common sense” because he lives with his parents, the record is unclear of the extent to which Father advised DCS of his living arrangements.
Jp Morgan v. Mgm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jp Morgan v. Mgm Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Court, (citing Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., ).
Mans v. Lawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mans v. Lawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(stating that the chosen state’s law will govern a contractual relationship as long as the 4 MANS v. LAWSON Decision of the Court chosen law has some nexus with the parties or the contract); Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., (“Procedural matters are usually governed by the law of the forum.”).
Sands v. bill/zinkel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sands v. bill/zinkel Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.
Balestrieri v. Balestrieri 300 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Balestrieri v. Balestrieri 300 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
In Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., , however, we held a defendant does not submit himself to the jurisdiction of the court by filing a compulsory counterclaim.
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. 43 P.3d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc. 43 P.3d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
TIB contends, however, that Texas law governs this issue, citing Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., -58 , -81 (App.1987).
Matter of Liquidation of Azstar Cas. Co. 938 P.2d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Matter of Liquidation of Azstar Cas. Co. 938 P.2d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
They argue, however, that computerized research charges are similar to expenses for paraprofessional support staff, citing Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.
Paul R. Peterson Construction, Inc. v. Arizona State Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund 880 P.2d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Paul R. Peterson Construction, Inc. v. Arizona State Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund 880 P.2d 694 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.
Edwards v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF TRANSP. 859 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Edwards v. Arizona Department of Transportation/Motor Vehicle Division 859 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Edwards v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF TRANSP. 859 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., , Nystrom v. Massachusetts Casualty Ins.
Edwards v. Arizona Department of Transportation/Motor Vehicle Division 859 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., , Nystrom v. Massachusetts Casualty Ins.
Landi v. Arkules 835 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Landi v. Arkules 835 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., -58 , -81 (App.1987).
Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. PMI Mortgage Insurance 800 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. PMI Mortgage Insurance 800 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
In support of that contention, PMI cites a *59 , and Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc., , that permit recovery of amounts paid for legal assistant and law clerk fees.
Hamilton v. Municipal Court of Mesa 788 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hamilton v. Municipal Court of Mesa 788 P.2d 107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.
Phoenix Arbor Plaza, Ltd. v. Dauderman 785 P.2d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Phoenix Arbor Plaza, Ltd. v. Dauderman 785 P.2d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
See Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.
Healey v. Coury 783 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Healey v. Coury 783 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
“A claim is liquidated when it is subject to mathematical computation without reliance upon opinion or discretion.” Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.
MacPherson v. Taglione 762 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
MacPherson v. Taglione 762 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
95, 102 (1945); see also, Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.