Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cochise County v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, 825 P.2d 968.

38 citing documents.

Robert Burns v. Arizona Public Service Co Ariz. 2022
Robert Burns v. Arizona Public Service Co Ariz. 2022
v. Ariz. Health Care Cost Containment Sys., )).
Simms v. Simms Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Simms v. Simms Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
v. Ariz. Health Care Cost Containment Sys., (“An administrative agency must follow the rules it promulgates.”); cf. Ariz. Dep’t of Water Res.
Saguaro Healing LLC v. State of Arizona 470 P.3d 636 Ariz. 2020
Saguaro Healing LLC v. State of Arizona 470 P.3d 636 Ariz. 2020
¶19 Although the AMMA allows ADHS to adopt rules governing dispensaries, see § 36-2803(A)(4)(a), “[t]he scope of an agency’s power is measured by statute and may not be expanded by agency fiat,”
Enterprise Life v. Adoi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Enterprise Life v. Adoi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Arizona State University ex rel. Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona State Retirement System 349 P.3d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Arizona State University ex rel. Arizona Board of Regents v. Arizona State Retirement System 349 P.3d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. Ariz. Health Care Cost Containment Sys.
Sharpe v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 207 P.3d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Sharpe v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 207 P.3d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Arizona State Democratic Party v. State 98 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Arizona State Democratic Party v. State 98 P.3d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Admin., , , to support their contention.
Facilitec Inc v. J Elliott Hibbs 80 P.3d 765 Ariz. 2003
Facilitec Inc v. J Elliott Hibbs 80 P.3d 765 Ariz. 2003
v. Bentley, 187 Ariz. 229, 232, (stating that “‘[t]he scope of an agency’s power is measured by statute and may not be expanded by agency fiat’”) (citing Cochise County v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment Sys., 170 Ariz. 443, 445, ).
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Canyoneers, Inc. 23 P.3d 684 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Canyoneers, Inc. 23 P.3d 684 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
See, , (stating that the scope of an agency’s power is measured by statute and “may not be expanded by agency fiat”) (citation omitted).
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Care Computer Systems, Inc. 4 P.3d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Arizona Department of Revenue v. Care Computer Systems, Inc. 4 P.3d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
University Medical Center, Corp. v. Pima County 937 P.2d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
University Medical Center, Corp. v. Pima County 937 P.2d 375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
holding that an “inmate of a public institution” does not include one en route to the institution for booking and incarceration, is contrary to the trial court’s ruling in the instant case.
State v. Graves 932 P.2d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Graves 932 P.2d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
As a general rule, “words and phrases used in statutes and rules have their ordinary meaning unless the context indicates otherwise.”
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. Bentley 928 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. Bentley 928 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
“The scope of an agency’s power is measured by statute and may not be expanded by agency fiat.”
Southwest Ambulance, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Health Services 902 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Southwest Ambulance, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Health Services 902 P.2d 1362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Cochise County v. Arizona Health Care Cost *262 Containment System, , see generally Frank E. Cooper, Administrative Agencies and the Courts 275-90 (1951) (discussing the legal effect of rules).
Brown v. Arizona Department of Real Estate 890 P.2d 615 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Brown v. Arizona Department of Real Estate 890 P.2d 615 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Carondelet Health Services, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 895 P.2d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Carondelet Health Services, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 895 P.2d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 869 P.2d 500 Ariz. 1994
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 869 P.2d 500 Ariz. 1994
See Fullen, 122 Ariz. at 428 , 595 P.2d at 660 ; , Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial Comm’n
Samaritan Health Services v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 875 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Samaritan Health Services v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 875 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994