Cited by

any genuine issues of material fact [exist] and whether the [superior] court erred in applying the law.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 8 3 CARMINUCCI, et al. v. TRIMARK, et al. Decision of the Court (App. 1998).

See Bothell v. Two Points Acres, Inc., ¶ 7 (App. 1998) (noting appellate courts may address denied cross-motion to avoid piecemeal litigation).

in fact or law.” Thus, when the justice court found Matthews materially breached his lease agreement, the justice court, “in essence, disposed of” his counterclaims and “rendered the [justice] court’s judgment ‘final.’” See Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 6 (App. 1998).

Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.

at ¶ 11 (citing Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 7 (App. 1998)), but we may review the denial if the tax court denied it on a point of law, id.

Bothell v. Two Points Acres, Inc., ¶ 7 (App. 1998).

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing all the facts and all reasonable inferences “in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., –16, ¶¶ 2, 8 (App. 1998).

Co., ¶ 10 (2018), viewing all facts and reasonable inferences "in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered," Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 2 (App. 1998).

See also Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 7 (App. 1998) (holding that although an order denying summary judgment is generally not appealable, the court may review the order along with one granting summary judgment “to avoid piecemeal litigation”) ( and State Farm Mut.

“On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we view all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” ¶ 1 n.3 (App. 2015) (quoting Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 2 (App. 1998)).

Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 8 (App. 1998).

Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Ctr., Inc. , , 110, ¶ 19, , 239 (App. 2007) (quoting Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc. , , 316, ¶ 8, , 50 (App. 1998) ).

See Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 2 (App. 1998) (motion for summary judgment); Monaco v. HealthPartners of So.

¶51 Although an order denying summary judgment is generally not appealable, to avoid piecemeal litigation we may consider the merits of the motion and direct entry of summary judgment in Jones’s favor if he is “entitled to that as a matter of law and there are no genuine issues of material fact precluding it.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., see also State Farm Mut.

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 8, and view the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, ¶ 7, (citations omitted).

P. 56(a); Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 7, Anderson v. Country Life Ins.

3 “On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we view all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 2 (App. 1998).

Airport Auth., n.3 (App. 2014) (quoting Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 2 (App. 1998)).

Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.

in [A]irport property.” According to Plaintiffs, Yuma County “maintain[ed] the right to do whatever it want[ed] to the [A]irport” and, consequently, YCAA “[wa]s really a shell.” 3 “On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we view all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 2

Because the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not itself an appealable order, see In re 1996 Nissan Sentra, Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., and because the trial court did not address these claims below, see Stewart v. Mut.

See Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., n.2, ¶ 6, n.2 (App. 1998) (noting that this court has an independent obligation “to determine whether we have jurisdiction” over an appeal).

Capital One moved for summary judgment asserting claim preclusion and, regarding the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, absence of extreme 1 “On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we view all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was entered.” Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 2

Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc., ¶ 2