Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 53 P.3d 203.

1269 citing documents.

Barbara K. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Barbara K. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rigoberto O. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Williams v. Cole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Williams v. Cole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 4, (stating that the trier of fact “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and 5 Although § 14-2712(E)(1) did not go into effect until after Cathy filed her counter-petition, 2010 Ariz. Sess.
Tonya C. v. Ades, D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Tonya C. v. Ades, D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Desirae M. v. Ades, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Desirae M. v. Ades, L.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 319 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 319 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 12, 6 SHAWANEE S. v. ADES, et al. Opinion of the Court
Christopher K. v. Markaa S. 311 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Christopher K. v. Markaa S. 311 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Sec., ¶ 4 , (juvenile court is in best position to weigh evidence and assess witness credibility in severance proceedings); see also A.R.S.
Bennigno R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 312 P.3d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Bennigno R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 312 P.3d 861 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Reeck v. Mendoza 304 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Reeck v. Mendoza 304 P.3d 1122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Sec., ¶ 12 , (family court is charged with resolving conflicts in evidence, and the court of appeals does not reweigh evidence on review); Premier Fin.
Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 301 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 301 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 282 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 282 P.3d 437 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Xavier R. and Athena R. v. Ades and Joseph R. 280 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Xavier R. and Athena R. v. Ades and Joseph R. 280 P.3d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Lisa K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 281 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Lisa K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 281 P.3d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH-2010-0047 263 P.3d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH-2010-0047 263 P.3d 643 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Sec., , ¶¶ 4 & 12, , 205 & 207 (App.2002) (recognizing trial court in best position to observe witnesses, judge credibility, weigh evidence, and make findings of fact; acknowledging appellate court must defer to trial court “unless no reasonable evidence supports those findings”).
Mario G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 257 P.3d 1162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Mario G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 257 P.3d 1162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
¶ 4 , (appellate court defers to the juvenile court’s credibility determinations and findings of fact unless no reasonable *288 evidence supports them and does not reweigh the evidence).
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 256 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 256 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Brenda O. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 244 P.3d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Brenda O. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 244 P.3d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Kenneth B. v. Tina B. 243 P.3d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Kenneth B. v. Tina B. 243 P.3d 636 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Mh2009-002120 237 P.3d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Re Mh2009-002120 237 P.3d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Raymond F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 231 P.3d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Raymond F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 231 P.3d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Sec., ¶4 , (citation omitted).
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Matthew L. 225 P.3d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Matthew L. 225 P.3d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
2 ADES argues Matthew’s anticipated release date was irrelevant evidence based on our court’s ¶ 8 , , 354 n. 3, ¶ 12, , 687 n. 3 (App.1998).
Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 219 P.3d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jordan C. , Jesse C., Kailynn C., Michele C. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jordan C. , Jesse C., Kailynn C., Michele C. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Sec., and we will affirm a termination order that is supported by reasonable evidence.
Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 219 P.3d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Sec., , and we will affirm a termination order that is supported by reasonable evidence.
Antonio M. v. Ades and Daniel M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Antonio M. v. Ades and Daniel M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Sec., (accepting factual findings when supported by reasonable evidence).
Denise R. v. Ades, Draven R. and Larsen R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Denise R. v. Ades, Draven R. and Larsen R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Sec., (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the juvenile court ordered severance, we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).1 1 For this reason, we need not address ADES’s suggestion we deny review of
Bobby G. v. Ades & Allison G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008