Cited by

Sec., ¶ 3 (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the [superior] court ordered severance, we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the juvenile court ordered severance, we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).

Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2002)).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (citations omitted).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the juvenile court ordered severance, [this Court] need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (where one statutory ground found by the superior court was proper, “we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds”) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the [superior] court ordered [termination], we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (When severance may be affirmed on one of the statutory grounds, we need not consider alternative grounds.); see also Crystal D. v. Dep’t of Child Safety, -58, ¶¶ 5-7 (App. 2017) (The failure to challenge one of the two prongs waives any argument to that prong.).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (“If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the [superior] court ordered [termination], we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.”)).