Cited by

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) ("If clear and convincing evidence supports any one of the statutory grounds on which the juvenile court ordered severance, we need not address claims pertaining to the other grounds.").

Sec., ¶¶ 11–12 (App. 2002) (explaining that the resolution of conflicting evidence “is uniquely the province of the juvenile court as the trier of fact”).

Sec., ¶ 4 (App. 2002) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2002) (citing cases).

Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2002) (“[W]e do not re- weigh the evidence on review.”).

Sec., ¶ 4 (App. 2002) (citation omitted).

Sec., ¶ 4 (App. 2002) (explaining that we “will accept the juvenile court’s findings of fact unless no reasonable evidence supports those findings.”).

Sec., ¶ 3 (App. 2002) (citations omitted).

Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2002) (citations omitted).

Sec., ¶ 12 (App. 2002) (“The resolution of such conflicts in the evidence is uniquely the province of the juvenile court as the trier of fact; we do not re-weigh the evidence on review.”).

Sec., ¶ 8 (App. 2002) (holding that the court must consider the entire sentence length).

Sec., ¶ 4 (App. 2002), we review deferentially the court’s determination that Mother did not prove her allegation that Father bit A.F.