Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Oscar O., 100 P.3d 943.

575 citing documents.

Traci E. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004).
Kayoma S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Philip P., Katherine J. v. Dcs, V.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kayoma S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004)).
Philip P., Katherine J. v. Dcs, V.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004) (citing Jennifer B. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Tabatha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Phyllicia C. v. Dcs, M.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tabatha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jeremy M. v. Dcs, J.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Phyllicia C. v. Dcs, M.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004) (noting the trier of fact “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts”) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Anthony E. v. Dcs, A.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Anthony E. v. Dcs, A.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
As the trier of fact, the juvenile court “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of the witnesses, and resolve disputed facts.” ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Lilian G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lilian G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Guthrie S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Guthrie S. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Darren G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Darren G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004).
Kristi S. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kristi S. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
As the trier of fact, the juvenile court “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of the witnesses, and resolve disputed facts.” ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Franswa C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Franswa C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Mandy P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mandy P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Pedro R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Munoz v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Munoz v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Pedro R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 14, (appellate court will not reweigh the evidence or supersede the juvenile court’s assessment of the evidence for its own).
Jean K. v. Jeremy M., J.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jean K. v. Jeremy M., J.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4, and we will affirm a severance order unless it is clearly erroneous.
Ryan W. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Ryan W. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
Brenda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Brenda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Vanessa D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Vanessa D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Cynthia G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Cynthia G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Patrick F. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Patrick F. v. Dcs, A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004) (citation omitted).
Jade K. v. Loraine K. and A.K. 380 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Jade K. v. Loraine K. and A.K. 380 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Bentley v. Bentley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Bentley v. Bentley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Forrest C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Forrest C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Tyren T., Brittany H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016