Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Oscar O., 100 P.3d 943.
-
Tyren T., Brittany H. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
- Armida E. v. Dcs, B.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Armida E. v. Dcs, B.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Dominique M. v. Department of Child Safety 376 P.3d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Dominique M. v. Department of Child Safety 376 P.3d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Michelle H. v. Dcs, J.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Chantelle L. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Chantelle L. v. Dcs, C.W.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
-
Michelle H. v. Dcs, J.S.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
- Shawn B. v. Dcs, S.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Shawn B. v. Dcs, S.B.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶¶ 16-17 (App. 2004) (recognizing that permanency and stability are in children’s best interests).
- Mark T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Mark T. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004).
- Carlos O. v. Dcs, C.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Victoria G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Jennifer S. v. Dcs, Z.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Carlos O. v. Dcs, C.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Victoria G. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Jennifer S. v. Dcs, Z.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Suzanne S. v. Dcs, F.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Suzanne S. v. Dcs, F.S.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Barbara A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Barbara A. v. Dcs, J.W.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Sara R. v. Jeremy R., C.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Sara R. v. Jeremy R., C.R.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6 (App. 2004).
- Roberto A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Roberto A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
- Kathy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Kathy S. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004) (citing Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
- Johanna K. v. Dcs, R.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Johanna K. v. Dcs, R.H.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6, 5 The best interest requirement may be met if, for example, a current adoptive plan exists for the child, or even that the child is adoptable.
- Catherine B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Catherine B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- Delancy v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Delancy v. Wright
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4, (stating that the trial court “is in the best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts”).
- Louis C. v. Department of Child Safety 353 P.3d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-
Louis C. v. Department of Child Safety
353 P.3d 364
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
v. Oscar O., ¶¶ 4, 14, 947 (App. 2004) (juvenile court, as trier of fact, in “best position to weigh the evidence, observe the parties, judge the credibility of witnesses, and resolve disputed facts”).
- Andrew B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Andrew B. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. Oscar O., ¶ 6, (citation omitted).
- Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
v. Oscar O., ¶ 4 (App. 2004).
- Tiffany F. v. Dcs, G.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Tiffany F. v. Dcs, G.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Jason B. v. Dcs, S.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Jason B. v. Dcs, S.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Oscar F. v. Dcs, E.F., M.f, C. F. G.F. and L.F. 330 P.3d 1023 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- Oscar F. v. Dcs, E.F., M.f, C. F. G.F. and L.F. 330 P.3d 1023 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
- Lloyd B., Tina M. v. Ades, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Lloyd B., Tina M. v. Ades, L.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- Rigoberto O. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014