Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bennigno R. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 312 P.3d 861.

168 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.P. and H.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.P. and H.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Sec., (in determining whether a child would benefit from termination, one relevant factor is “whether the current placement is meeting the child’s needs”); Maricopa Cnty.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to R.M. and B.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to R.M. and B.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See Demetrius L., 239 Ariz. at 4, ¶ 12; see also Bennigno R. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ Sec., ¶ 23 (App. 2013).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Sec., ¶ 16 (App. 2013) (recognizing child welfare considerations “are rarely, if ever, static” and “it is more likely that the child’s environment is constantly evolving”) (citation omitted).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.R. and B.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.R. and B.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Sec., –50, ¶ 19 (App. 2013), and Shawanee S. v. Arizona Dep’t of Econ.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Sec., ¶ 23 (App. 2013) (“[T]he child’s best interests must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence.” (citation omitted)).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to R.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to R.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to R.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to R.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to J.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ygnacio F. v. Dcs, M.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ygnacio F. v. Dcs, M.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2013) (noting parent’s failure to object to the propriety of services before termination hearing waived the right to challenge them on appeal).
Michael O. v. Dcs, C.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Michael O. v. Dcs, C.O. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 23 (App. 2013) (“[T]he continued presence of the conceded statutory grounds for [termination] also may, in certain cases, negatively affect the children.”).
Kiara D. v. Rudy N., R.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Kiara D. v. Rudy N., R.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
John K. v. Dcs, C.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
John K. v. Dcs, C.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 31 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).
Toren C., Fawn W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Toren C., Fawn W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 23 (App. 8 TOREN C., FAWN W. v. DCS et al. Decision of the Court 2013) (“[T]he continued presence of the conceded statutory grounds for [termination] also may, in certain cases, negatively affect the children.”).
Martha C. v. Dcs, T.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Martha C. v. Dcs, T.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 23 (App. 2013); Audra T. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Allegra G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Allegra G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Steven H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Steven H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 23 (App. 2013); Maricopa Cnty.
Sanford v. Dna Investments Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sanford v. Dna Investments Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (noting that courts can summarily reject arguments "[b]ased on the lack of proper and meaningful argument"); see also ARCAP 13(a)(7) ("An 'argument' .
Michael C., Tyana T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Michael C., Tyana T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 23 (App. 2013) (quoting Maricopa Cnty.
Tasha R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tasha R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶¶ 16–17 (App. 2013).
Janna G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Janna G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 19 (App. 2013); Shawanee S. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Cindy M. v. Claudio H., C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cindy M. v. Claudio H., C.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 23 (App. 2013); Maricopa Cnty.