Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Audra v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 982 P.2d 1290.

342 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to K.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to A.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
established she was adoptable and expressed a desire “to stay where she[ ] has a home.” See Audra T. v. Dep’t of Econ Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998) (adoption is a factor favoring severance); see also Alma S., 245 Ariz. at 151, ¶ 14 (when a child’s current placement satisfies her needs and adoption is legally feasible and probable, a juvenile court may determine that terminating parental rights to allow for adoption is in the child’s best int
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to E.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.C. and N.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to C.C. and N.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., ¶ 6 (App. 1998) (affirming termination based in part on evidence that foster family was “committed to adopting” both siblings, who were “very close”).
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to N.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998); Bennigno R. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998) ("One factor the court may properly consider in favor of [termination] is the immediate availability of an adoptive placement.").
Lisa R. v. Dcs, A.H., W.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Lisa R. v. Dcs, A.H., W.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Felicia S., Robert S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Felicia S., Robert S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998) (noting a court “may properly consider in favor of severance” factors that include “the immediate availability of an adoptive placement” and “whether an existing placement is meeting the needs of the child”).
Latoya P. v. Dcs, K.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Latoya P. v. Dcs, K.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Martha C. v. Dcs, T.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Martha C. v. Dcs, T.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Brandon K., Delia B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Brandon K., Delia B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998) (explaining “[o]ne factor the court may properly consider in favor of [termination] is the immediate availability of an adoptive placement”).
Bernardino v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Bernardino v. Dcs, J.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Carl P. v. Dcs, C.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Carl P. v. Dcs, C.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998) (a court “may properly consider in favor of severance,” factors that include “the immediate availability of an adoptive placement” and “whether an existing placement is meeting the needs of the child”).
Javier v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Javier v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1988) (indicating two factors the court “may properly consider in favor of severance” are “the immediate availability of an adoptive placement” and “whether an existing placement is meeting the needs of the child”).
Tasha R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Tasha R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998); see also Mary Lou C. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Mario B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Mario B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Victor K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Victor K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Nelturiah S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Nelturiah S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1988) (indicating two factors the 5 NELTURIAH S. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court court “may properly consider in favor of severance” are “the immediate availability of an adoptive placement” and “whether a
Lara S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lara S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Timothy B., Michael M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Emerald M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Emerald M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron B. v. Ashley H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998) (a court “may properly consider in favor of severance” factors that include “the immediate availability of an adoptive placement” and “whether an existing placement is meeting the needs of the child”).
Leticia P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Leticia P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998) (indicating two factors the court “may properly consider in favor of severance” are “the immediate availability of an adoptive placement” and “whether an existing placement is meeting the needs of the child”).
Chelsea R. v. Dcs, H.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Chelsea R. v. Dcs, H.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 2 (App. 1998) (citing Maricopa Cty.
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Eboney H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by