Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Audra v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 982 P.2d 1290.

342 citing documents.

Cynthia G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998); Maricopa Cny.
Nona P. v. Charles W., E.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 5, (citation omitted).
Kimberlee D., Kevin M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kimberlee D., Kevin M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Willie W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Willie W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Angel B., Osanna B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Angel B., Osanna B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Armida E. v. Dcs, B.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Armida E. v. Dcs, B.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 5, (stating one factor favoring severance is whether the current placement is meeting the needs of the child).
Dominique M. v. Department of Child Safety 376 P.3d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Dominique M. v. Department of Child Safety 376 P.3d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 5, (stating one of the factors favoring severance is that the current placement is meeting the child’s needs).
Michelle G., De'von J. v. Dcs, S.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Danica F. v. Dcs, G.Y. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Michelle G., De'von J. v. Dcs, S.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Danica F. v. Dcs, G.Y. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 5 (App. 1998) (in determining best interests of the child, the court may consider the immediate availability of an adoptive placement).
Summer P. v. Shirley M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Summer P. v. Shirley M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 2, (citations omitted).
Mark T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mark T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 2 (App. 1998) (citing Maricopa Cnty.
Cristian R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Cristian R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Victoria G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Victoria G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 2 (App. 1998) (citing Maricopa Cnty.
Suzanne S. v. Dcs, F.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Suzanne S. v. Dcs, F.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 2 (App. 1998) (citing Maricopa Cnty.
Barbara A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Barbara A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 2 (App. 1998) (citing Maricopa Cnty.
Michael M., Sr. v. Dcs, M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Michael M., Sr. v. Dcs, M.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions 367 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Frank R. v. Mother Goose Adoptions 367 P.3d 88 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Roberto A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Roberto A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kathy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kathy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 2 (App. 1998) (citing Maricopa Cnty.
Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F./d.L. 365 P.3d 353 Ariz. 2016
Demetrius L. v. Joshlynn F./d.L. 365 P.3d 353 Ariz. 2016
Sec., ¶ 5, (in determining best interests, a court “may properly consider in favor of severance” factors that include “the immediate availability of an adoptive placement” and “whether an existing placement is meeting the needs of the child”).
Johanna K. v. Dcs, R.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Johanna K. v. Dcs, R.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Justin C. v. Dcs, S.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Justin C. v. Dcs, S.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 2, (citations omitted).
Jaclyn R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jaclyn R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec, ¶ 5 (App. 1998) citing Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty.
David H. v. Dcs, T.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
David H. v. Dcs, T.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 2 (App. 1998) (citations omitted).
Tanya N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tanya N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
J.S., E.K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
J.S., E.K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015