Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Anderson, 517 P.2d 508.

106 citing documents.

State v. Henley 687 P.2d 1220 Ariz. 1984
State v. Henley 687 P.2d 1220 Ariz. 1984
State v. Moya 683 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Moya 683 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
“When a defendant makes a statement at trial which is inconsistent with an earlier statement his credibility is clearly in question.”
State v. Routhier 669 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1983
State v. Routhier 669 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1983
State v. Sorrell 645 P.2d 1242 Ariz. 1982
State v. Sorrell 645 P.2d 1242 Ariz. 1982
State v. Sullivan 635 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1981
State v. Sullivan 635 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1981
2240, *218 2245 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976)
State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
State v. Miller 628 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Miller 628 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
and State v. Landrum, 25 Ariz.App.
State v. Robinson 620 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Robinson 620 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
1229 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965); , State v. Shing, supra.
State v. La Mountain 611 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1980
State v. La Mountain 611 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1980
State v. Asbury 602 P.2d 838 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Asbury 602 P.2d 838 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Johnson 594 P.2d 514 Ariz. 1979
State v. Johnson 594 P.2d 514 Ariz. 1979
824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)
State v. Rios 592 P.2d 1299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Rios 592 P.2d 1299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Jones 582 P.2d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Jones 582 P.2d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Landrum, 25 Ariz.App.
State v. Tuzon 575 P.2d 1231 Ariz. 1978
State v. Tuzon 575 P.2d 1231 Ariz. 1978
2240 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976)
State v. Jovenal 573 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Jovenal 573 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Mendiola, 23 Ariz.App.
State v. Calhoun 563 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Calhoun 563 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Our own Supreme Court had anticipated Doyle in a , is exemplary.
State v. Holsinger 563 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1977
State v. Holsinger 563 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1977
State v. Villagrana 564 P.2d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Villagrana 564 P.2d 1252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Nor is the evidence of *287 appellant’s guilt overwhelming so as to reflect that the error, though fundamental, did not contribute to the guilty verdict, thereby rendering the error harmless beyond a
State v. Valdez 562 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Valdez 562 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Scott 555 P.2d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Scott 555 P.2d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Shing, supra *363 (defendant found with 2,600 pounds of marijuana); , (in burglary case, defendant admitted breaking into the house and selling the stolen property to a pawnbroker).
State v. Raffaele 550 P.2d 1060 Ariz. 1976
State v. Raffaele 550 P.2d 1060 Ariz. 1976
State v. Eliason 544 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Eliason 544 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Mendiola, supra.
State v. Landrum 544 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Landrum 544 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Clark 543 P.2d 1122 Ariz. 1975
State v. Clark 543 P.2d 1122 Ariz. 1975
State v. Ward 542 P.2d 816 Ariz. 1975
State v. Ward 542 P.2d 816 Ariz. 1975
On appeal, the state concedes that the statements of the deputy county attorney were improper but contends that in light of the evidence against Ward, it is unnecessary to reverse the judgment and remand the case for a