Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Anderson, 517 P.2d 508.

106 citing documents.

State v. Salazar 539 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Salazar 539 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
mandates that the question and answer given here is improper comment on the defendant’s right to remain silent.
State v. Mendiola 532 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Mendiola 532 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Holmes 520 P.2d 1118 Ariz. 1974
State v. Holmes 520 P.2d 1118 Ariz. 1974
We held that a defendant’s failure to take the stand in his preliminary examination was in no way an admission of guilt, and that “it was clearly error for the trial court to permit such prejudicial statements.” , we held that it was fundamental error to ask a similar question and thereafter comment to the jury in argument on the fact that defendant had not previously told anyone what had happened.