Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Kelly, 526 P.2d 720.

108 citing documents.

State v. Sutherland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Sutherland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Introducing evidence that a defendant had mug shots taken before the arrest in the case at trial “can be error when [the evidence infers] that the defendant has a prior arrest record.”
Aida Renta Trust v. Department of Revenue 3 P.3d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Aida Renta Trust v. Department of Revenue 3 P.3d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
2637 ; Chevron, 131 Ariz. at 438 , 641 P.2d at 1282 (party challenging constitutionality has burden to show beyond a reasonable doubt that legislation is infirm); , cert.
General Motors Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 938 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
General Motors Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 938 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Ives 927 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1996
State v. Ives 927 P.2d 762 Ariz. 1996
Likewise, in State v. Henderson, , cert.
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Runningeagle 859 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1993
State v. Runningeagle 859 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1993
State v. Beckerman 814 P.2d 1388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Beckerman 814 P.2d 1388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Smith 803 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Smith 803 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
1029, 1035 , 31 L.Ed.2d 349 (1972); , cert denied, 420 U.S. 935 , 95 S.Ct.
Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of Appeals 789 P.2d 1061 Ariz. 1990
Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of Appeals 789 P.2d 1061 Ariz. 1990
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
Although the introduction into evidence of mug shots or the mention of the fact that the police had photos of the defendant taken sometime before the crime can be error when it infers a prior arrest, , cert.
State v. Robinson 735 P.2d 798 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Robinson 735 P.2d 798 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Goodyear Farms v. City of Avondale 714 P.2d 386 Ariz. 1986
Goodyear Farms v. City of Avondale 714 P.2d 386 Ariz. 1986
State v. Alvarez 701 P.2d 1178 Ariz. 1985
State v. Alvarez 701 P.2d 1178 Ariz. 1985
Undoubtedly he was arrested at some point.” We have stated that “[t]he introduction into evidence of mug shots, or the mention of the fact that defendant had mug shots taken prior to the arrest in the case at trial, can be error when they infer that the defendant has a prior arrest record.” , cert.
Goodyear Farms v. City of Avondale 714 P.2d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Goodyear Farms v. City of Avondale 714 P.2d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Gamez 696 P.2d 1327 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gamez 696 P.2d 1327 Ariz. 1985
State v. Loughran 693 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Loughran 693 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
16 , 27 L.Ed.2d 4 (1970)
State v. Rodriquez 700 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Rodriquez 700 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Kenyon v. Hammer 688 P.2d 961 Ariz. 1984
Kenyon v. Hammer 688 P.2d 961 Ariz. 1984
State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
State v. Walton 650 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Walton 650 P.2d 1264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's Foundation 637 P.2d 1053 Ariz. 1981
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's Foundation 637 P.2d 1053 Ariz. 1981
Whether a particular classification is unreasonable and therefore illegal will depend on “the character of the classification in question; the individual interests affected by the classification; and the government interest asserted in support of the classification.” , cert, denied, 420 U.S. 935 , 95 S.Ct.
State v. McGann 645 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. McGann 645 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
M. Udall, Arizona Law of Evidence, § 21 at 36 (1960); , cert.
State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC. 629 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1981
State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC. 629 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1981