Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Harrison, 533 P.2d 1143.

70 citing documents.

State v. Evans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Evans Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Ultimately, “[t]he credibility of witnesses is an issue of fact to be resolved by the jury; as long as there is substantial supporting evidence, we will not disturb their determination.”
Simms v. Simms 567 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Simms v. Simms 567 P.3d 92 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(“The credibility of witnesses is an issue of fact to be resolved by the jury[.]”); (“[T]he credibility of witnesses when their stories conflict is a question of fact for the jury.”); ¶ 52 (2000) (noting the jury determin
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Such an exercise of authority under this statute is a proper exercise of the State’s police power because, “[w]ithout a doubt, the state has a valid interest in the safety of its highways for travelers.” (citing State ex rel.
State v. West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
at 428, ¶ 18 (reasoning that smell of marijuana from backpack made its incriminating character immediately apparent); (finding that the odor of marijuana furnished probable cause).
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 373 P.3d 549 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Ian Harvey Cheatham 375 P.3d 66 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 373 P.3d 549 Ariz. 2016
(holding that odor of burning marijuana emanating from hotel room afforded probable cause to believe crime had been or was being committed); (holding that odor of marijuana afforded probable cause to believe automobile contained contraband); –02, –84 (1970) (holding that probable cause was established by odor of marijuana emanating from suitcase).
State of Arizona v. Ian Harvey Cheatham 375 P.3d 66 Ariz. 2016
State v. Bibbins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bibbins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Cheatham 353 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cheatham 353 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
2 The superior court denied the motion, finding probable cause existed based on the “plain smell”
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-02 , -84 (1970); State v. Raymond, 21 Ariz.App.
State v. Wiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wiggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(citation omitted) (stating the credibility of witnesses is a matter for the jury to decide).
State v. Navarrette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Navarrette Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“The credibility of witnesses is an issue of fact to be resolved by the jury; as long as there is substantial supporting evidence, we will not disturb their determination.” (citation omitted).
State of Arizona v. Guillermo C. Becerra 291 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Guillermo C. Becerra 291 P.3d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State v. Mendoza-Ruiz, 4 ¶¶ 14-18, (stop of vehicle proper as community caretaking function when reasonable to believe vehicle having trouble); (proper exercise of police power to stop vehicle for public safety reasons because tire “bouncing”).
State v. One Single Family Residence At 1810 East Second Avenue 969 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
State v. One Single Family Residence At 1810 East Second Avenue 969 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
See, , approved, , , -19 , -53 (App.1982); United States v. Innie, 7 F.3d 840, 844 (9th Cir.1993).
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Jackson 760 P.2d 589 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Jackson 760 P.2d 589 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Briefly, the facts most favorable to sustaining the verdict, , follow.
State v. White 701 P.2d 1230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. White 701 P.2d 1230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Phelps 608 P.2d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Preciado 596 P.2d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Preciado 596 P.2d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
State v. Lynch 587 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Lynch 587 P.2d 770 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Million 583 P.2d 897 Ariz. 1978
State v. Million 583 P.2d 897 Ariz. 1978
State v. Decker 580 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1978
State v. Decker 580 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1978
State v. Walker 579 P.2d 1091 Ariz. 1978
State v. Walker 579 P.2d 1091 Ariz. 1978
United States v. Payne, 555 F.2d 475 (5th Cir. 1977).
State v. White 574 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. White 574 P.2d 840 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by