Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Edwards, 529 P.2d 1174.

99 citing documents.

State v. Mitcham 535 P.3d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Mitcham 535 P.3d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
sufficient to warrant a man of reasonable caution to believe that a felony had been committed by the person arrested.” Sardo, 112 Ariz. at 515 ().
State of Arizona v. Brian Matthew MacHardy 521 P.3d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State of Arizona v. Brian Matthew MacHardy 521 P.3d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
Probable cause for a warrantless arrest exists if “the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the arresting officer at the time were sufficient to warrant a man [or woman] of reasonable caution to believe that a felony had been committed by the person arrested.” see also A.R.S.
State v. Viste Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Viste Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Belvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Belvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
3 STATE v. BELVIN Decision of the Court made only after the defendant requests a voluntariness hearing) ( ).
State v. Spencer 333 P.3d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Spencer 333 P.3d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Voluntariness exists when a choice is “the result of a free choice of the individual,” but not when the individual’s “will has been overborne and [her] capacity for decision diminished.” (discussing voluntariness of confession).
State v. Mitchell 62 P.3d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Mitchell 62 P.3d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
ing to searches and interrogation of suspects, that an arrest is “complete” when the suspect’s “liberty of movement is interrupted and restricted by the police.” , (-48 , -87 (1985)); , (-60 , -77 (1974)).
State v. Bentlage 961 P.2d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
State v. Bentlage 961 P.2d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
407 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963)
State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
State v. Tapia 767 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1988
State v. Tapia 767 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1988
State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
State v. Leslie 708 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1985
State v. Spence 704 P.2d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Spence 704 P.2d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Williams 664 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1983
State v. Williams 664 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1983
(defendant’s will overborne).
State v. Emery 642 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1982
State v. Emery 642 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1982
State v. Osbond 623 P.2d 1232 Ariz. 1981
State v. Osbond 623 P.2d 1232 Ariz. 1981
State v. Blankinship 622 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Blankinship 622 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Tom 613 P.2d 842 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Tom 613 P.2d 842 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Petersen 604 P.2d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Petersen 604 P.2d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Although a suspect may not be formally placed under arrest until later, “an arrest is complete when the suspect’s liberty of movement is interrupted and restricted by the officers.” -60 , -77 (1974).
State v. Smith 599 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1979
State v. Smith 599 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1979
1458 , 55 L.Ed.2d 500 (1978)
State v. Edwards 594 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1979
State v. Edwards 594 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1979
State v. Jerousek 590 P.2d 1366 Ariz. 1979
State v. Jerousek 590 P.2d 1366 Ariz. 1979
Ryan v. SUPERIOR CT., IN & FOR MARICOPA CTY. 590 P.2d 924 Ariz. 1979
Ryan v. SUPERIOR CT., IN & FOR MARICOPA CTY. 590 P.2d 924 Ariz. 1979
State v. Alvarado 591 P.2d 973 Ariz. 1979
State v. Alvarado 591 P.2d 973 Ariz. 1979
State v. McGinty 584 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1978
State v. McGinty 584 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1978
State v. Hall 586 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Hall 586 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978