Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Scott, 555 P.2d 1117.

142 citing documents.

State v. Frasard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Frasard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Sierra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Sierra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Butler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(citations and internal quotation marks omitted).
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Sammantha Lucille Rebecca Allen 513 P.3d 282 Ariz. 2022
And reversal “occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Douglas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
This court overturns a conviction when “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
State v. Fulcher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Fulcher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Khorrami Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Khorrami Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only [when] there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
State v. Amman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Amman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We will affirm unless there is a “complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Best Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Best Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
We will affirm unless there is a “complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (- 25 (1976)).
State v. Wadi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Wadi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
We will reverse only if “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” –25 (1976).
State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Garcia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Burgess 428 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Burgess 428 P.3d 192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (–25 (1976)).
State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Although “a properly instructed jury may occasionally convict even when it can be said that no rational trier of fact could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,” West, 226 Ariz. at 563, ¶ 17 (citation omitted), such a circumstance arises only when “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction,” –25 (1976).
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Wooten Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶34 We will not reverse unless “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction[s].” –25 (1976).
State v. Grewe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Grewe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
We will reverse a case based on insufficient evidence if “there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Snethen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Snethen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶15 “Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)) (emphasis added).
State v. Cryer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cryer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Battle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Battle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Sherod Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sherod Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Jorgensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jorgensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Belvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Belvin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, ¶ 30 (App. 2015) ( ¶ 15 (2011)), and will reverse “only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction,” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Kinney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Kinney Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).
State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Coffelt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
3 STATE v. COFFELT Decision of the Court insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” (-25 (1976)).