Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cook, 564 P.2d 877.

83 citing documents.

Flynn v. Hon starr/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Flynn v. Hon starr/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
On appeal, “[w]e view the facts in the light most favorable to support the trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress.” ¶ 8 (2018) ().
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lito Hernandez 417 P.3d 207 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lito Hernandez 417 P.3d 207 Ariz. 2018
State v. Cook , , 192, , 881 (1977).
State of Arizona v. Francisco Flores Huez, Jr. 380 P.3d 103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Francisco Flores Huez, Jr. 380 P.3d 103 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
“In analyzing a ruling on a motion to suppress, we consider ‘only the evidence presented at the suppression hearing,’” and “[w]e view the facts in the light most favorable to support the trial court’s ruling on the motion to suppress,” id.
State v. Flores 260 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Flores 260 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
(citing Vale v. Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 35 , 90 S.Ct.
State v. Hummons 253 P.3d 275 Ariz. 2011
State v. Hummons 253 P.3d 275 Ariz. 2011
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ¶2 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to support the trial court’s ruling on the motion to suppress.”
Petersen v. City of Mesa 63 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Petersen v. City of Mesa 63 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
¶ 10 Concern that the Fourth Amendment might not bar a warrantless entry for police to “secure” and inspect a home while awaiting a warrant led the court, in State v. Bolt, to clarify that “[s]uch entries are ‘per se unlawful’ under our state constitution.” -65 , -24 (1984) ( , ).
State v. Flores 42 P.3d 1186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Flores 42 P.3d 1186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
192 n. 6, , 881 n. 6 (1977).
Mazen v. Seidel 940 P.2d 923 Ariz. 1997
Mazen v. Seidel 940 P.2d 923 Ariz. 1997
DeWitt, 184 Ariz. at 467 , 910 P.2d at 12 ( , ).
State v. DeWitt 910 P.2d 9 Ariz. 1996
State v. DeWitt 910 P.2d 9 Ariz. 1996
Fisher, 141 Ariz. at 239 , 686 P.2d at 762 ; , (upon expiration of exigency justifying a warrantless entry and search and absent more than mere suspicion that items seen in plain view were stolen property, there is no justification for continued warrantless searching).
State v. DeWitt 897 P.2d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Gissendaner 865 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Gissendaner 865 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(no hot pursuit where officers did not witness crime, there was no indication that the suspect was armed, there was no indication, of how fresh the flight was, and two officers were present so residence could have been secured while warrant was obtained).
State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
State v. Stanley 809 P.2d 944 Ariz. 1991
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
State v. Valenzuela 788 P.2d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Valenzuela 788 P.2d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Reasoner 742 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Reasoner 742 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Ault 724 P.2d 545 Ariz. 1986
State v. Ault 724 P.2d 545 Ariz. 1986
Note, Exigent Circumstances for Warrantless Home Arrests, 23 Ariz.L.Rev.
State v. Borbon 706 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1985
State v. Borbon 706 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1985
State v. Sheko 704 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Sheko 704 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Bolt 689 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1984
State v. Bolt 689 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1984
State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
State v. Silva 670 P.2d 737 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Silva 670 P.2d 737 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. LaPonsie 664 P.2d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. LaPonsie 664 P.2d 223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
that the knock and announce rule applied when an unlocked and partially open door was pushed open, entry through a wide open doorway has not been interpreted under A.R.S.
State v. Gerlaugh 654 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1982
State v. Gerlaugh 654 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1982
State v. Kelly 636 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Kelly 636 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
State v. Piller 628 P.2d 976 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981