Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gretzler, 612 P.2d 1023.

106 citing documents.

State v. Cannon 713 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1985
(“The fact that its application may have prevented [appellant] from taking the stand is not material.”)
State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
435 , 78 L.Ed.2d 367 (1983) (burden on defendant to show mitigating circumstances); , cert.
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
State v. Salazar 707 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Williams 698 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1985
State v. Salazar 707 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
364 , 70 L.Ed.2d 191 (1981)
State v. Just 675 P.2d 1353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Just 675 P.2d 1353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Routhier 669 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1983
State v. Routhier 669 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1983
State v. Nightwine 671 P.2d 1289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Nightwine 671 P.2d 1289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. McDaniel 665 P.2d 70 Ariz. 1983
State v. McDaniel 665 P.2d 70 Ariz. 1983
State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
Although the facts of this case have been fully described in previous appeals, , [Gretzler I]; , [Steelman I], a summary of these facts is included here as necessary for the determination of this appeal.
State v. Politte 664 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Politte 664 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Rodgers 655 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Rodgers 655 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Burrus 655 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Burrus 655 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Encinas 647 P.2d 624 Ariz. 1982
State v. Encinas 647 P.2d 624 Ariz. 1982
(decided almost eight months before the trial in the instant case), we held that a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to present evidence on his or her behalf includes the right to call a cofelon to testify even if it has been determined that the cofelon will invoke the Fifth Amendment as to all
State v. Axley 646 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1982
State v. Axley 646 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1982
State v. Emery 642 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1982
State v. Emery 642 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1982
State v. Williams 641 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Williams 641 P.2d 899 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Piatt 644 P.2d 881 Ariz. 1981
State v. Piatt 644 P.2d 881 Ariz. 1981
State v. Ramos 648 P.2d 127 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. McElyea 635 P.2d 170 Ariz. 1981
State v. McElyea 635 P.2d 170 Ariz. 1981
State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
“A confession will be found involuntary where the court, considering all the circumstances, determines that one of the following exists: (1) impermissible conduct by police, (2) coercive pressures not dispelled, or (3) confession derived directly from prior involuntary statement.”
State v. Vickers 633 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1981
State v. Vickers 633 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1981
We have stated: “The admission or exclusion of photographs of murder victims is left to the trial judge’s discretion, (citation omitted) As long as the photographs have probative value they are admissible, even though they may arouse the emotions of the jury, (citation omitted)” , , 1049 (1980).
State v. Munson 631 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Munson 631 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981