Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gretzler, 612 P.2d 1023.
-
State v. Vickers
633 P.2d 315
Ariz. 1981
We have stated: “The admission or exclusion of photographs of murder victims is left to the trial judge’s discretion, (citation omitted) As long as the photographs have probative value they are admissible, even though they may arouse the emotions of the jury, (citation omitted)” , , 1049 (1980).
- State v. Munson 631 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
- State v. Munson 631 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
- State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC. 627 P.2d 1081 Ariz. 1981
-
State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC.
627 P.2d 1081
Ariz. 1981
A factual statement of defendant’s
- State v. McDaniel 617 P.2d 1129 Ariz. 1980
-
State v. McDaniel
617 P.2d 1129
Ariz. 1980
1065 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965)
- State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
-
State v. Mulligan
613 P.2d 1266
Ariz. 1980
Northern California Pharmaceutical Association v. United States, 306 F.2d 379 (9th Cir.), cert.