Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 616 P.2d 888.
-
State v. Hensley
691 P.2d 689
Ariz. 1984
252 , 66 L.Ed.2d 119 (1980); , , cert.
- State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
- State v. James 685 P.2d 1293 Ariz. 1984
-
State v. James
685 P.2d 1293
Ariz. 1984
The statutory expression of heinous, cruel, or *147 depraved is in the disjunctive, and all of the expressions or one of them “ ‘could constitute an aggravating circumstance.’ ” , , , cert.
- State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Gonzales 681 P.2d 1368 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Gonzales 681 P.2d 1368 Ariz. 1984
- State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. McCall
677 P.2d 920
Ariz. 1983
State v. Grilz, supra; , , cert.
- State v. Jordan 672 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Jordan 672 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Roberts 677 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Roberts 677 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Harding 670 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1983
- Estate of Sims v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 673 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Estate of Sims v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ. 673 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Routhier 669 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Spoon 669 P.2d 83 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Spoon 669 P.2d 83 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Routhier 669 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Grilz
666 P.2d 1059
Ariz. 1983
State v. Chapple, supra; , , cert.
- State v. Richmond 666 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Richmond 666 P.2d 57 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Edwards 665 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Edwards
665 P.2d 59
Ariz. 1983
See United States v. Jackson, 572 F.2d 636, 639 (8th Cir.1978); United States v. White, 488 F.2d 660, 662 (8th Cir.1973); -35 , -95 (1980)
- State v. Grijalva 667 P.2d 1336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Grijalva 667 P.2d 1336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Earby 665 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Rumsey 665 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Rumsey 665 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Earby 665 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Hunter 664 P.2d 195 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Hunter 664 P.2d 195 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Graham 660 P.2d 460 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Graham
660 P.2d 460
Ariz. 1983
For this aggravating circumstance to be present, the murder must have been committed for a “financial motivation.” State v. Clark, 126 * P.2d 888 (1980).
- State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Gerlaugh 659 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Celaya 660 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Celaya 660 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Woratzeck 657 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1982