Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clark, 616 P.2d 888.

179 citing documents.

State v. Zuck 658 P.2d 162 Ariz. 1982
State v. Zuck 658 P.2d 162 Ariz. 1982
State v. Williams 650 P.2d 1202 Ariz. 1982
State v. Williams 650 P.2d 1202 Ariz. 1982
State v. Navarre 647 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1982
State v. Navarre 647 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1982
1492 , 71 L.Ed.2d 693 (1982); , , , cert.
State v. Poland 645 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1982
State v. Poland 645 P.2d 784 Ariz. 1982
Heinous and depraved as used in the same statute meant the mental state and attitude of the perpetrator as reflected in his words and actions.” , cert.
State v. Blazak 643 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1982
State v. Conroy 642 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Conroy 642 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Rumsey 636 P.2d 1209 Ariz. 1981
State v. Rumsey 636 P.2d 1209 Ariz. 1981
cert, denied 449 U.S. 1067 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Kelly 636 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Kelly 636 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
State v. Inglish 631 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Inglish 631 P.2d 1102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
another first-degree murder case, our Supreme Court again, in affirming a finding of an especially depraved murder, said, in part, “In addition it must be noted that the appellant kept a spent bullet as a grisly souvenir of his crime”.
State v. Vickers 633 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1981
State v. Vickers 633 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1981
State v. Brown 631 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Brown 631 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
See State v. Watson, supra; , State v. Jordan, supra; State v. Steelman, supra; , , State v. Evans, supra.
State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980
State v. Bishop 622 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1980