Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Tison, 633 P.2d 335.

205 citing documents.

State v. Poehnelt 722 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Poehnelt 722 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents 711 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents 711 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
rehearing denied, 459 U.S. 882 , 103 S.Ct.
State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
391 , 74 L.Ed.2d 520 (1982); (trial court properly rejected evidence of good character as a mitigating circumstance in the light of defendant’s otherwise unexplained criminal conduct); State v. [Ricky] Tison, -45 , -54 (1981), cert.
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
State v. Clabourne 690 P.2d 54 Ariz. 1984
State v. (Ricky) Tison, , cert.
State v. Tison 690 P.2d 755 Ariz. 1984
State v. Tison 690 P.2d 747 Ariz. 1984
State v. Tison 690 P.2d 747 Ariz. 1984
State v. Tison 690 P.2d 755 Ariz. 1984
The facts of this ease are set forth in our decision on direct appeal, see (Raymond) Tison, supra, and in the companion case, State v. (Ricky) Tison
State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
180 , 74 L.Ed.2d 147 (1982); , cert.
State v. Martin 679 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1984
State v. Martin 679 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1984
The state argues, , cert.
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
180 , 74 L.Ed.2d 147 (1982) and State v. (Ricky) Tison, , cert.
State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Lambright 673 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
we found cruelty based on the infliction of such emotional distress.
State v. Harding 670 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1983
State v. Harding 670 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1983
180 , 74 L.Ed.2d 147 (1982); , , cert.
Spencer v. COCONINO CTY. SUPER. CT., DIV. 3 667 P.2d 1323 Ariz. 1983
Spencer v. Coconino County Superior Court 667 P.2d 1323 Ariz. 1983
Spencer v. COCONINO CTY. SUPER. CT., DIV. 3 667 P.2d 1323 Ariz. 1983
Spencer v. Coconino County Superior Court 667 P.2d 1323 Ariz. 1983
State v. Bishop 670 P.2d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Bishop 670 P.2d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Hanson 674 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Hanson 674 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Lujan 666 P.2d 71 Ariz. 1983
State v. Lujan 666 P.2d 71 Ariz. 1983
State v. Van Alcorn 665 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Van Alcorn 665 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Although there is no Arizona authority directly on point, , cert.
State v. Marquez 660 P.2d 1243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Marquez 660 P.2d 1243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Gerlaugh 659 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1983
State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
State v. Zaragoza 659 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1983
(Gordon, V.C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); , cf. Quince v. State, 414 So.2d 185, 187 (Fla.1982) (“beating, wounding, raping, and manual strangulation of an eighty-two year old, frail woman easily qualified as heinous”).
State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Gretzler 659 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1983
State v. Poland, supra, 132 Ariz. at 285 , 645 P.2d at 800 ; State v. (Ricky) Tison, , , State v. Clark, supra, 126 Ariz. at 436 , 616 P.2d at 896
State v. Politte 664 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Politte 664 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Although we recognize that a failure to raise an issue in the trial court may preclude its consideration on appeal, even if a constitutional question is presented, , we nevertheless believe that we should consider the appellant’s contentions here since substantial rights of a fundamental nature are involved which could have resulted in severe prejudice to the appellant.
State v. Hickle 650 P.2d 1216 Ariz. 1982
State v. Hickle 650 P.2d 1216 Ariz. 1982
See also State v. (Raymond) Tison
State v. Britson 636 P.2d 628 Ariz. 1981