Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Shreeve v. Greer, 173 P.2d 641.

61 citing documents.

Offerman v. Granada 418 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Offerman v. Granada 418 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co. 233 P.3d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
West Pinal Family Health Center, Inc. v. McBryde 785 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
West Pinal Family Health Center, Inc. v. McBryde 785 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Tucson Estates, Inc. v. Superior Court 729 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Tucson Estates, Inc. v. Superior Court 729 P.2d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
63 , or for specific performance of a contract to sell real property, , it has been held to be improperly filed in an action on a note, Mammoth Cave Production Credit Ass’n v. Gross, , or to impose a constructive trust on shares of stock, , 147 P. 722 (1915), or to recover a real estate commission
Jolly v. Kent Realty, Inc. 729 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Jolly v. Kent Realty, Inc. 729 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Shreeve owned real property which Melvin Greer and Byron Heap and their wives sought to purchase.
Colonial Villas, Inc. v. Title Insurance 703 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Colonial Villas, Inc. v. Title Insurance 703 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Thus, the very strict requirements for specific performance, , do not apply here.
Nowell v. Andrew Wright Enters., Inc. 691 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Nowell v. Andrew Wright Enters., Inc. 691 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Nationwide Resources Corp. v. Massabni 658 P.2d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Nationwide Resources Corp. v. Massabni 658 P.2d 210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
238 P. 327 (1925); A.R.S.
Register v. Coleman 633 P.2d 418 Ariz. 1981
Register v. Coleman 633 P.2d 418 Ariz. 1981
Del Rio Land, , see Restatement (Second) of Contracts §§ 207-209.
Cote v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. 626 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Cote v. A. J. Bayless Markets, Inc. 626 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Nelson v. Cannon 616 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Wayt v. Wayt 600 P.2d 748 Ariz. 1979
Wayt v. Wayt 600 P.2d 748 Ariz. 1979
Compare Bennett v. United States Land, Title and Legacy Co., , 141 P. 717 (1914) , and Tucker v. Bylar, 27 Ariz.App.
Del Rio Land, Inc. v. Haumont 574 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Del Rio Land, Inc. v. Haumont 574 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
cription as will serve to identify him, or by the name or description of his agent, and (b) the land, goods or other subject-matter to which the contract relates, and (c) the terms and conditions of all the promises constituting the contract and by whom and to whom the promises are made.”
How v. Fulkerson 528 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
How v. Fulkerson 528 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
H. McClintock, Handbook of the Principles of Equity 129 (1948).
Denbo v. Badger 503 P.2d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Denbo v. Badger 503 P.2d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
and we therefore affirm the dismissal of Count One of the complaint as to all the defendants.
Tucson Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sundell 472 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1970
Tucson Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Sundell 472 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1970
TUCSON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N v. Sundell 464 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
TUCSON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'N v. Sundell 464 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Rodieck v. Rodieck 450 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Rodieck v. Rodieck 450 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
§ 25-211, Subsection B, gives the husband control over the personalty of the community “during coverture.”
Cuna Mutual Insurance Society v. Dominguez 450 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Cuna Mutual Insurance Society v. Dominguez 450 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
267 P. 598, 601 (1928), , -645 (1946) ; and compare Seargeant v. Commerce Loan and Inv.
King v. Uhlmann 437 P.2d 928 Ariz. 1968
King v. Uhlmann 437 P.2d 928 Ariz. 1968
We have previously held, , , that the husband has the right to enter into a contract on behalf of the community for the purchase of property, and that it is not necessary for the wife to join in signing this contract.
Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co. 420 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Kammert Bros. Enterprises, Inc. v. Tanque Verde Plaza Co. 420 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
An actual tender by the plaintiff is unnecessary when, from the acts of the defendant or from the situation of the property it would be wholly nugatory.” (Emphasis added) , Shreeve was an equity case asking for specific performance, and equitable relief was allowed.
T. D. Dennis Builder, Inc. v. Goff 418 P.2d 367 Ariz. 1966
T. D. Dennis Builder, Inc. v. Goff 418 P.2d 367 Ariz. 1966
Smith v. Tang 412 P.2d 697 Ariz. 1966
Smith v. Tang 412 P.2d 697 Ariz. 1966
262 P. 995 , *204 “The doctrine is founded upon the principle that courts of equity regard the substance and not the mere form of the contract and 'consider things directed or agreed to be done, as having been actually performed.’ ” Lebrecht v. Beckett, supra.
Graham County Electric Cooperaiive, Inc. v. Town of Safford 388 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1963
Graham County Electric Cooperaiive, Inc. v. Town of Safford 388 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1963
The-law is well settled that specific performance-will not be granted unless there is mutuality of remedy, , .
Dunlap v. Fort Mohave Farms, Inc. 363 P.2d 194 Ariz. 1961
Dunlap v. Fort Mohave Farms, Inc. 363 P.2d 194 Ariz. 1961
Young v. Bishop 353 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1960

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by