Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Morse, 617 P.2d 1141.
-
In Re Timothy M.
4 P.3d 449
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
¶ 14 Our supreme court has similarly held that a criminal defendant’s plea agreement is “subject to the approval of the trial court.” -32 , -48 (1980).
- State v. Lee 959 P.2d 799 Ariz. 1998
- State v. Lee 959 P.2d 799 Ariz. 1998
- State v. McKinney 917 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1996
-
State v. McKinney
917 P.2d 1214
Ariz. 1996
See State v. Draper, 162 Ariz 433, 440, -32 , -48 (1980).
- Espinoza v. Superior Court 886 P.2d 1364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Espinoza v. Superior Court
886 P.2d 1364
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
A defendant, however, has no right to a plea bargain in general, , nor to any specific provision in it.
- State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Draper 784 P.2d 259 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Draper 784 P.2d 259 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Bridgeforth 750 P.2d 3 Ariz. 1988
-
State v. Bridgeforth
750 P.2d 3
Ariz. 1988
Draft No. 4, 1955) (same); -31 , -46 (1980) (deletion of language concerning intent in statute indicates legislature intended to exclude specific intent as an element of receiving stolen property); Gerber, Arizona’s New Criminal Code: An Overview and a Critique, 1977 ARIZ.ST.L.J.
- State v. Carrillo 750 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- State v. Carrillo 750 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- State v. Delk 734 P.2d 612 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
State v. Delk
734 P.2d 612
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
837 , 51 L.Ed.2d 30 (1977)
- State v. Solano 724 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1986
- State v. Martin 679 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Martin 679 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Cornejo 677 P.2d 1312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Cornejo 677 P.2d 1312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Berlat 666 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Berlat 666 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Roylston 660 P.2d 872 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Roylston 660 P.2d 872 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Celaya 660 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Celaya 660 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1983
- Hare v. SUPER. COURT, IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA 652 P.2d 1387 Ariz. 1982
- Hare v. SUPER. COURT, IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA 652 P.2d 1387 Ariz. 1982