Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Celaya, 660 P.2d 849.

185 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Ricky Alonzo Hippensteel Ariz. 2026
State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
State of Arizona v. Jesus Ismael Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
(no “strained application” of felony murder rule where defendant was found guilty of felony robbery).
State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Peterson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶31 “A lesser-included offense is one ‘composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.’” ¶ 7 (2015) ().
State v. Velasquez-Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Velasquez-Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Carter, 249 Ariz. at 316, ¶ 10 ( ¶ 14 (2006))
State v. Estevez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Estevez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
second-degree murder, and precluded [Estevez] from receiving ‘the full benefit of the reasonable-doubt standard.’” Valenzuela, 194 Ariz. at 407, ¶ 13 ().
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State of Arizona v. Bayron Perez Agueda 513 P.3d 1112 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Bayron Perez Agueda 513 P.3d 1112 Ariz. 2022
¶12 Under Arizona law, “[a] lesser-included offense is one ‘composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.’” Lua, 237 Ariz. at 303 ¶ 7 (); –30 ¶ 6 (App. 2014) (“[T]he greater offense must require each element of the lesser offense plus one or more additional elements not required by the lesser offense.”)
State v. Etienne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Etienne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶33 A lesser-included offense is an offense “composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.” (citation omitted).
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Teran 510 P.3d 502 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
A lesser-included offense is an offense “composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.”
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson II 502 P.3d 437 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson II 502 P.3d 437 Ariz. 2022
itation.”); (“Arizona’s felony murder rule is not unconstitutional.”); see also State v. (Thomas) West, (“The felony-murder rule, designed as it is to protect human life, represents sound public policy, is reasonably related to the end sought to be accomplished and is not constitutionally impermissible.” ()), ¶ 30 n.7 (1998).
State v. Najera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Najera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Wilson, 185 Ariz. at 257 ().
State v. Blomdahl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Blomdahl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(A lesser-included offense is an offense “composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.”).
State v. Rubio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Rubio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Fender Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Fender Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
A lesser-included offense is “composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.”
State of Arizona v. Bobby Ray Carter Jr 469 P.3d 449 Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. Bobby Ray Carter Jr 469 P.3d 449 Ariz. 2020
State v. Prado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Prado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“To constitute a lesser-included offense, the offense must be composed solely of some but 7 STATE v. PRADO Decision of the Court not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.” (citation omitted).
State v. Moering Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Moering Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“To constitute a lesser-included offense, the offense must be composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.”
State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
¶ 11 ; see State v. Celaya , , 252, , 853 (1983).
State v. Matthews 428 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Matthews 428 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Celaya , , 251, , 852 (1983).
State v. Barrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Barrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
–4, ¶ 15 (2006) (theft is a lesser-included offense of robbery); (same); (same); (same); –73 (App. 1981) (same).
State v. Billups Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Billups Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“A mistrial or reversal is warranted only if it appears reasonably possible that error might have materially influenced the jury.”) ( 14 The witness testified that “he had heard that [the] appellant had affiliations with organized crime
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Dodd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Dodd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“To constitute a lesser-included offense, the offense must be composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.”
State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015