Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Celaya, 660 P.2d 849.
- State v. Superior Court 747 P.2d 569 Ariz. 1987
- State v. Superior Court 747 P.2d 569 Ariz. 1987
- State v. Govan 744 P.2d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State v. Govan 744 P.2d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State v. Davis 742 P.2d 1356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- State v. Davis 742 P.2d 1356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
- State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
- State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
-
State v. Correll
715 P.2d 721
Ariz. 1986
How *477 ever, a mistrial or reversal is required “only if it appears reasonably possible that error might have materially influenced the jury.” , (citation omitted).
- State v. Angle 720 P.2d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- State v. Kinkade 709 P.2d 884 Ariz. 1985
-
State v. Kinkade
709 P.2d 884
Ariz. 1985
In determining whether an instruction on a lesser-included offense is proper under Rule 23.3, this court set forth a
- State v. Whittle 752 P.2d 489 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- State v. Whittle 752 P.2d 489 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- State v. Borbon 706 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Borbon 706 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Sowards 709 P.2d 542 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
-
State v. Sowards
709 P.2d 542
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
and held that theft as defined in A.R.S.
- State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Lamb 690 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Lamb 690 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1984
- State v. McNair 687 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1984
- State v. McNair 687 P.2d 1230 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Ramirez 688 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. Ramirez 688 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Mincey 687 P.2d 1180 Ariz. 1984
- State v. McLoughlin 679 P.2d 504 Ariz. 1984
- State v. McLoughlin 679 P.2d 504 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Mitchell 675 P.2d 738 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
-
State v. Mitchell
675 P.2d 738
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
The defendant may not be found guilty of an offense for which no form of verdict has been submitted to the jury.” Whether such an instruction on a lesser-included offense should be given is determined by a
- State v. Wise 671 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
State v. Wise
671 P.2d 918
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
at 253 , : The option of convicting on a lesser-included offense affords the jury a less drastic alternative than the choice between conviction of the offense charged and acquittal and ensures the defendant the full benefit of the reasonable-doubt standard.