Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cone v. Righetti, 240 P.2d 541.

41 citing documents.

Boatman v. Casey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Boatman v. Casey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
See, -75 (1952) (holding order modifying custody, visitation, and support appealable as a “special order” made after final judgment).
Yee v. Yee 484 P.3d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Yee v. Yee 484 P.3d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
See, (post-decree order affecting custody and support of minor children); –66 ¶¶ 19–20 (App. 2011) (post-decree order modifying spousal maintenance); ¶ 8 (App. 2007) (post-decree order on grandparent visitation); Merrill v. Merrill, 230
Backstrand v. Backstrand 479 P.3d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Backstrand v. Backstrand 479 P.3d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(“[B]efore the court has authority to change the custody of a minor child it must be shown that there had arisen a change in the conditions or circumstances surrounding the children affecting their general welfare and that it would be for their best interests that a change in custody be made.”) (emphasis a
Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wright v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
2 WRIGHT v. WRIGHT Decision of the Court petition, even if the order is modifiable) ().
Sheehan v. Flower 170 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Sheehan v. Flower 170 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
(order modifying custody, visitation, and support was appealable as a "special order” made after final judgment); -01, ¶¶ 3-4 , -32 (App.2000) (order changing custody of minor child and establishing visitation rights was an appe
In Re the Marriage of Dorman 9 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In Re the Marriage of Dorman 9 P.3d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
§ 12-2101(C); , (order modifying custody, visitation, and support was appealable special order after judgment).
Canty v. Canty 874 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Canty v. Canty 874 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
352, 355 , Cone v. Righetti -76 , Bailey v. Bailey, 3 Ariz.App.
Lowther v. Hooker 632 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Lowther v. Hooker 632 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Bailey v. Bailey, 3 Ariz.App.
Black v. Black 560 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1977
Black v. Black 560 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1977
Alford v. Alford 499 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Alford v. Alford 499 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
“The custody of the children here involved was given to the appellee in the original decree in conformity with stipulation of the parties filed with the court.
Anderson v. Anderson 481 P.2d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Anderson v. Anderson 481 P.2d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Bailey v. Bailey, 3 Ariz.App.
Johnson v. Johnson 479 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Johnson v. Johnson 479 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Solomon v. Solomon 427 P.2d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Solomon v. Solomon 427 P.2d 156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
In Re Guardianship of Rodgers 413 P.2d 744 Ariz. 1966
In Re Guardianship of Rodgers 413 P.2d 744 Ariz. 1966
(Emphasis supplied) , we said of A.R.S.
Bailey v. Bailey 412 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Bailey v. Bailey 412 P.2d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Smith v. Smith 367 P.2d 230 Ariz. 1961
Smith v. Smith 367 P.2d 230 Ariz. 1961
Galbraith v. Galbraith 356 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1960
Galbraith v. Galbraith 356 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1960
*362 , ; , ; , ; , ; , .
Ward v. Ward 353 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1960
Ward v. Ward 353 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1960
Porter v. Stanford 347 P.2d 35 Ariz. 1959
Woodford v. Superior Court 309 P.2d 973 Ariz. 1957
Woodford v. Superior Court 309 P.2d 973 Ariz. 1957
Davis v. Davis 277 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1954
Davis v. Davis 277 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1954
Cone v. Righetti, 1952, , .