Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. McMurtrey, 664 P.2d 637.

96 citing documents.

State v. Michael Apelt 861 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1993
State v. Michael Apelt 861 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1993
State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
State v. Lopez 857 P.2d 1261 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Lopez 847 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1992
State v. Lopez 847 P.2d 1078 Ariz. 1992
State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
Vickers, 129 Ariz. at 515-16 , 633 P.2d at 324-25 ; Richmond, 114 Ariz. at 197-98 , 560 P.2d at 52-53 .
State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
State v. McMurtrey (McMurtrey I), , , cert.
State v. Kasten 823 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Kasten 823 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. McMurtrey (McMurtrey I), , , cert.
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
“An appellate court will not find error on the ground that the defendant was shackled unless it is shown that the jury saw the shackles.”
State Ex Rel. Neely v. Sherrill 799 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1990
State Ex Rel. Neely v. Sherrill 799 P.2d 849 Ariz. 1990
at 209, 644 P.2d at 1285 (Feldman, J., opinion of the court); , , cert.
State v. Mauro 766 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1988
State v. Mauro 766 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1988
State v. Ortiz 764 P.2d 13 Ariz. 1988
State v. Ortiz 764 P.2d 13 Ariz. 1988
State v. McMurtrey 726 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1986
State v. McMurtrey 726 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1986
State v. Mauro 716 P.2d 393 Ariz. 1986
State v. Mauro 716 P.2d 393 Ariz. 1986
State v. Risco 712 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Risco 712 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Appellant presented no competent evidence to the trial court establishing that any jurors had in fact seen him in handcuffs, , , cert.
State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
State v. Tims 693 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1985
State v. Tims 693 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1985
State v. McMurtrey 691 P.2d 1099 Ariz. 1984
State v. McMurtrey 691 P.2d 1099 Ariz. 1984
We need answer only one question on appeal and that is whether the trial court committed reversible error in requiring the defendant to prove mitigating circumstances “beyond a reasonable doubt.” , , cert.
State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
The first is to determine the qualifications of the prospective jurors, id., and the second is to enable the parties to intelligently exercise their challenges of the jur- or — both peremptory challenges and challenges for cause, id.
State v. LaGrand 674 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. LaGrand 674 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
(defendant fired several shots in a crowded bar); State v. Ortiz, supra (defendant set fire to a house to dispose of victim’s body knowing that three young children were inside); , (defendant fired several shots in a crowded college gymnasium); St
State v. McDaniel 665 P.2d 70 Ariz. 1983
State v. McDaniel 665 P.2d 70 Ariz. 1983
State v. Zaragoza, supra.