Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Zaragoza, 659 P.2d 22.
- State v. Williams 904 P.2d 437 Ariz. 1995
-
State v. Williams
904 P.2d 437
Ariz. 1995
1199 , 117 L.Ed.2d 439 (1992) ( , , cert.
- State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Bolton 896 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Barreras 892 P.2d 852 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Gonzales 892 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1995
-
State v. Barreras
892 P.2d 852
Ariz. 1995
(finding helplessness where elderly victim was easily manipulated and had limited mental capacity).
- State v. Gonzales 892 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1995
- State v. Salman 897 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
State v. Salman
897 P.2d 661
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
“[I]t is the rare case in which an improper instruction will justify reversal of a criminal conviction when no objection has been made in the trial court.” , (citing Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145, 154 , 97 S.Ct.
- State v. Styers 865 P.2d 765 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. Styers
865 P.2d 765
Ariz. 1993
Finally, giving a felony murder instruction “is not relevant “where the defendant intended to kill the victim or where the defendant knew with substantial certainty that his conduct would cause death.’ ” , ( , , cert.
- State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
- State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Witwer 856 P.2d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Witwer 856 P.2d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Lautzenheiser 864 P.2d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Lautzenheiser 864 P.2d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Spencer 859 P.2d 146 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Spencer 859 P.2d 146 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Herrera 850 P.2d 100 Ariz. 1993
-
State v. Herrera
850 P.2d 100
Ariz. 1993
(disposal of instrumentalities of crime suggest defendant appreciated the wrongfulness of his conduct).
- State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
-
State v. Atwood
832 P.2d 593
Ariz. 1992
(affirming death sentence of defendant who was convicted of first degree felony murder and who intended to kill or knew with substantial certainty that his conduct would cause death); Schad, 129 Ariz. at 573-74 , 633 P.2d at 382-83 (same).
- State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
- State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
- State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
-
State v. Fierroa
804 P.2d 72
Ariz. 1990
1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984); , (not an unconstitutional mandatory death penalty statute), cert.
- State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
-
State v. Amaya-Ruiz
800 P.2d 1260
Ariz. 1990
“Wide latitude is given in closing arguments and counsel may comment on the evidence and argue all reasonable inferences therefrom.”
- State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
-
State v. Hinchey
799 P.2d 352
Ariz. 1990
1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984); , (not an unconstitutional mandatory death penalty statute), cert.
- State v. Schaefer 790 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Schaefer 790 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Conner 786 P.2d 948 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Conner 786 P.2d 948 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. McCutcheon 781 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1989
- State v. McCutcheon 781 P.2d 31 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Valles 780 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Valles 780 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Rendon 776 P.2d 353 Ariz. 1989