DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Harding, 670 P.2d 383.

94 citing documents.

  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
    Second, defendant’s , cert.
  • State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
    2909, 2937 , 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976) (plurality opinion); , cert.
  • State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
  • State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
    “To form the basis for [the] aggravating circumstance [of pecuniary gain], the hope of pecuniary gain must be the impetus for the murder, not merely its result.” , ( , (Gordon, V.C.J., specially concurring)), cert.
  • State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
    1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 ; -84 , -37 (1986) (jury trial not required for capital sentence); , (prosecutorial discretion upheld), cert.
  • State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
    3200 , 105 L.Ed.2d 708 (1989); , (unfettered prosecutorial discretion).
  • State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Hinchey 799 P.2d 352 Ariz. 1990
    P.2d 1177, 1189 (1989) (“especially heinous, cruel or depraved” aggravating circumstance not unconstitutionally vague); , (burden of proof on defendant for mitigating circumstances constitutional); -84 , -37 (1986) (jury trial not required for capital sentence); , (prosecutorial discretion upheld), cert.
  • State v. Mott 784 P.2d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Mott 784 P.2d 278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
    1756 , 1773 n. 25, 95 L.Ed.2d 262 (1987); , cert.
  • State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
    Thus, “an unexpected or accidental death that was not in furtherance of the defendant’s goal of pecuniary gain, which occurs during the course of or flight from a robbery, does not in itself provide a sufficient basis for finding the aggravating circumstance.” -04 , -95 (emphasis added) (-97 , -95 (1983), later appeal, , , cert.
  • State v. Raseley 715 P.2d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Raseley 715 P.2d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
    at 2541 (trial judge warned the defendant that he thought it was a mistake not to accept the assistance of counsel, and that the defendant would be required to follow all the “ground rules” of trial procedure); , (trial judge, at pretrial hearings, determined the defendant’s educational level and his familiarity with the criminal rules of procedure, and told the defendant that his first degree murder charge “could result in the death sentence” and that “it is a terribly complex, terribly serious
  • State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
  • State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
    (-297 , -395 (1983) (Gordon, J. specially concurring), cert.
  • State v. Anzivino 716 P.2d 50 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Anzivino 716 P.2d 50 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
    See State v. Nash, supra (pecuniary gain aggravating factor not arbitrary or vague); , (Gordon, J., specially concurring) (cruel, heinous or depraved aggravating factor not unconstitutionally vague).
  • State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
    -97 , -95 (1983), (J. Gordon, specially concurring), cert.
  • State v. Rosthenhausler 711 P.2d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Rosthenhausler 711 P.2d 625 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Carter 700 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Carter 700 P.2d 488 Ariz. 1985
    at 1689-90 , 64 L.Ed.2d at 308 ; State v. Bums, supra, 142 Ariz. at 534, 691 P.2d at 300 ; , cert.
  • State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Roscoe 700 P.2d 1312 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Roscoe 700 P.2d 1312 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. McMurtrey 691 P.2d 1099 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. McMurtrey 691 P.2d 1099 Ariz. 1984
    Admittedly, , we stated that in making our independent review of the imposition of the death penalty we will ground *73 our independent review of whether a defendant has established a mitigating circumstance on a preponderance of the evidence standard.
  • State v. Hensley 691 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Hensley 691 P.2d 689 Ariz. 1984
    Justice Gordon, -97 , -95 (1983) cert.
  • State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
    § 13-1206) and CR-02597 (convictions of two counts of first degree murder, two counts of robbery, two counts of kidnapping, and theft, all affirmed by this court, , ).
  • State v. Chee 680 P.2d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Chee 680 P.2d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
    Cooper v. Fitzharris, 586 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir.1978)