Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Vazzano v. Superior Court, 249 P.2d 837.

26 citing documents.

Huber v. Arizona Naturopathic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Huber v. Arizona Naturopathic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Suppeland v. Nilz 623 P.2d 832 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Suppeland v. Nilz 623 P.2d 832 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Arizona State Tax Commission v. Phelps Dodge Corp. 568 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1977
Arizona State Tax Commission v. Phelps Dodge Corp. 568 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1977
.” 89 Ariz. at 279 , 361 P.2d at 405 .
Rinderknecht v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System 520 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Rinderknecht v. Maricopa County Employees Merit System 520 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
42 , 122 P.2d at 218 (Emphasis added) Accord, , , , *421 (1960)
Garza v. Industrial Commission 498 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Garza v. Industrial Commission 498 P.2d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
has a vastly different factual setting, the basic principle contained therein is very similar to that which supports our rationale in this case.
Campbell v. Superior Court 479 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1971
Campbell v. Superior Court 479 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1971
Crouch v. Justice of the Peace Court of the Sixth Precinct 440 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Crouch v. Justice of the Peace Court of the Sixth Precinct 440 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County 410 P.2d 479 Ariz. 1966
Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County 410 P.2d 479 Ariz. 1966
Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County 402 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima County 402 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
[1952], the court was concerned with the procedure to be followed in a trial de novo in the superior court after an appeal from a decision of the Superintendent of Liquor Licenses and Control.
Rojas v. Kimble 361 P.2d 403 Ariz. 1961
Rojas v. Kimble 361 P.2d 403 Ariz. 1961
We have repeatedly held that a trial de novo means a new trial “as though it were one of original jurisdiction in the superior court.” [ , ], , ; Vazzano v: Superior Court, , ; , ; , ; , ; , .
Welker v. Stevens 311 P.2d 832 Ariz. 1957
Welker v. Stevens 311 P.2d 832 Ariz. 1957
Counsel for petitioner have argued that inasmuch as the court found the proposed location was within 300 feet of a church, it exceeded its jurisdiction in refusing to grant a , at page 373, .
Chee Lee v. Superior Court 302 P.2d 529 Ariz. 1956
Chee Lee v. Superior Court 302 P.2d 529 Ariz. 1956
State v. Stevens 288 P.2d 1077 Ariz. 1955
State v. Stevens 288 P.2d 1077 Ariz. 1955
5 A.L.R.2d 668 ; see also other cases cited therein.