Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite General Petroleum Corp. v. Barker, 269 P.2d 729.

70 citing documents.

State v. Fischer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Fischer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
evidence does not view the evidence in the light most favorable to 5 STATE v. FISCHER Opinion of the Court sustaining the verdict, nor does it resolve all conflicting inferences in favor of sustaining the verdict.3 -12 (1969); -44 (1954); -49 (App. 1982).
Wiggs v. City of Phoenix 4 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Wiggs v. City of Phoenix 4 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
MacConnell v. Maricopa County Medical Society 724 P.2d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
MacConnell v. Maricopa County Medical Society 724 P.2d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
See Rule 51(a), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure
Kavanaugh v. Kavanaugh 641 P.2d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Kavanaugh v. Kavanaugh 641 P.2d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Cano v. Neill, 12 Ariz.App.
Long v. Corvo 639 P.2d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Long v. Corvo 639 P.2d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Mata 609 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mata 609 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1980
324 , 42 L.Ed.2d 280 (1974)
Crowe v. Miller 555 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Crowe v. Miller 555 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
In addition, , that: "...
Johnson v. Elliott 537 P.2d 927 Ariz. 1975
Johnson v. Elliott 537 P.2d 927 Ariz. 1975
We have repeatedly held “that the grant or denial of such motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and, barring a manifest abuse of that discretion, the lower court’s decision will be upheld on appeal.”
State v. Jones 521 P.2d 978 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jones 521 P.2d 978 Ariz. 1974
Witnesses § 429; Wigmore, Evidence § 1897 (3d ed. 1940)
State v. Clayton 514 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1973
State v. Clayton 514 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1973
Cavanagh v. Ohio Farmers Insurance Company 509 P.2d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Cavanagh v. Ohio Farmers Insurance Company 509 P.2d 1075 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw, 16 Ariz.App.
Dodge City Motors, Inc. v. Rogers 490 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Dodge City Motors, Inc. v. Rogers 490 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Rodriguez v. Williams 489 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1971
Rodriguez v. Williams 489 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1971
Brooks v. De La Cruz 473 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Brooks v. De La Cruz 473 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Cano v. Neill 473 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Cano v. Neill 473 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Hague 459 P.2d 321 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State Ex Rel. Herman v. Hague 459 P.2d 321 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Aguilar v. Carpenter, 1 Ariz.App.
Bullock v. Geyer 454 P.2d 865 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Bullock v. Geyer 454 P.2d 865 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
State v. Thomas 454 P.2d 153 Ariz. 1969
State v. Thomas 454 P.2d 153 Ariz. 1969
Blakely Oil, , ; Bradley [Produce] v. Philhower, , ; , 282 * , .” 88 Ariz. at page 247, 354 P.2d at page 864 .
Snethen v. Gomez 432 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Snethen v. Gomez 432 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
General *369 , and authorities cited therein.
State ex rel. Herman v. Southern Arizona Land Co. 424 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State ex rel. Herman v. Southern Arizona Land Co. 424 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
Pacific Guano Company v. Pinal County Land Company, 1 Ariz.App.
Gabriel Ex Rel. Gabriel v. Murphy 421 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Gabriel Ex Rel. Gabriel v. Murphy 421 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
A contrary rule would make for uncertainty and confusion, erode away the value of verdicts fairly won, and place a premium on ambush tactics at trial.”
State v. Narten 407 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1965
State v. Narten 407 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1965
Aguilar v. Carpenter 399 P.2d 124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Aguilar v. Carpenter 399 P.2d 124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Bass v. Renaud 398 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
In Re Thompson's Estate 398 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
In Re Thompson's Estate 398 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Bass v. Renaud 398 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965