Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Davis v. Davis, 277 P.2d 261.

63 citing documents.

Gipson v. Shinnink Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Gipson v. Shinnink Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Longhini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Longhini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
Pulkrabek v. Pulkrabeck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Pulkrabek v. Pulkrabeck Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Mother must show a change in circumstances “unknown at the time of the original decree, or occurring subsequent to the decree.” (emphasis added) (citation omitted); see also Backstrand, 250 Ariz. at 344–45, ¶¶ 17, 21 (holding a material change may occur “when the change has caused the original decree to serve its purpose no longer”) (citations omitted).
Nayeri v. Mohave County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Nayeri v. Mohave County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
at 571 ( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
Backstrand v. Backstrand 479 P.3d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Backstrand v. Backstrand 479 P.3d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶20 Relying on our supreme court’s Mother counters that the court must find the alleged change of circumstances both substantial and detrimental to the child’s welfare before it may consider changing the parenting plan.
Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lewis v. Rehkow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(holding modification of custody orders requires “cogent reasons” .
Barkley v. Icep Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Barkley v. Icep Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
–71 (1985) ( (“[T]he question is not whether the judges of this court would have made an original like ruling, but whether a judicial mind, in view of the law and circumstances, could have made the ruling without exceeding the bounds of reason.
Klarkowski v. Define Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Klarkowski v. Define Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(“We cannot substitute our discretion for that of the trial judge.” ( (Windes, J., specially concurring))).
Gonzales v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Gonzales v. Vargas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(holding modification of custody orders requires “cogent reasons” “constitut[ing] facts or conditions unknown at the time of the original [order], or occurring subsequent to the [order]”); (holding Arizona case law requires a showing of changed circums
Partipilo v. Pena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Partipilo v. Pena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
Porter v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Porter v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(citations omitted) (holding modification of custody orders requires “cogent reasons” such as changed conditions affecting “the child whose welfare is the paramount consideration at all times”); Hendricks, 153 Ariz. at 243 (holding Arizona case law requires a showing of changed circumstance’s materially af
Petrovich v. Branciforte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Petrovich v. Branciforte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines 366 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines 366 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
(Windes, J., specially concurring).
State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Corp. v. Warner (Warner II), - 71 (1985) (noting that, in review of a decision to grant or deny attorneys’ fees, courts should ask “whether a judicial mind, in view of the law and circumstances, could have made the ruling without exceeding the bounds of reason”) ( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
Hall Alpine v. Ashburner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Hall Alpine v. Ashburner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Warner, 143 Ariz. at 571, 694 P.2d at 1185 ( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Corp. v. Warner (Windes, J., specially concurring).
Mothersed v. Greenen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Mothersed v. Greenen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 273 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
( , (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 236 P.3d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 236 P.3d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
at 571 , 694 P.2d at 1185 ( , (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
SOLIMENO v. Yonan 227 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
SOLIMENO v. Yonan 227 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
( , (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 791 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 791 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
at 571, 694 P.2d at 1185 ( , (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Dressler 738 P.2d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Dressler 738 P.2d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
(Windes, J., specially concurring).
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner 694 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1985
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner 694 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1985
(Windes, J., specially concurring).