Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Nash, 694 P.2d 222.

406 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Victor Manuel Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 669 (1984)
State v. McKenna 214 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State v. McKenna 214 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Therefore, as the state correctly notes, “any evidence that tended to show that [McKenna] was guilty of a lesser degree of murder is completely irrelevant to his appeal of the felony murder conviction.” , (holding “[b]ecause specific intent to commit murder is irrelevant to a felony-murder charge,” no abuse of discretion in excluding expert testimony defendant “acted in self-defense caused by paranoid delusions”); , -52 (2001) (any
State v. Fischer 199 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. Fischer 199 P.3d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
13 Moreover, the State is not required to disprove “every conceivable hypothesis of innocence when guilt has been established by circumstantial evidence.”
State of Arizona v. Michael Manuel Dixon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Michael Manuel Dixon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See Shenah v. Henderson, 106 Ariz. 399, P.2d 407 (App. 1993); P.2d 29 (App. 1982); (sentencing court may consider information obtained from 8 out-of-court sources so long as information is disclosed to defendant who has opportunity to explain or deny it).
State of Arizona v. Rachel Marie Vallejo 158 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Rachel Marie Vallejo 158 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
2052, 2069 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) (to establish claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, defendant must show not only that counsel’s performance was deficient, but that it was prejudicial); , (same).
State of Arizona v. Steven Ray Miller 156 P.3d 1145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Steven Ray Miller 156 P.3d 1145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
courts may consider other kinds of evidence as well.” (state proved prior conviction based on out-of-state commitment record); State v. Nash, 143 Ariz. 392, 403, (holding prison records sufficient to establish prior convictions).
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes 141 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State v. McGill 140 P.3d 930 Ariz. 2006
State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
State v. Roque 141 P.3d 368 Ariz. 2006
Wood, 180 Ariz. at 69-70, 881 P.2d at 1174- 75
State v. McGill 140 P.3d 930 Ariz. 2006
at 161 , 823 P.2d at 28 ; -02 , -32 (1985) (allowing the State to submit reports from psychologists the defense could not cross-examine for the purpose of rebutting his mitigation evidence).
State of Arizona v. James Albert Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State of Arizona v. James Albert Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State v. Febles 115 P.3d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State v. Febles 115 P.3d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
State of Arizona v. Rodney George Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Rodney George Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 67 4 (1984); P.2 d 222 (1985).
State v. Sepahi 61 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State v. Sepahi 61 P.3d 479 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 693 (1984)
State of Arizona v. Carl W. Morgan, Jr 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Morgan 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Morgan 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State of Arizona v. Carl W. Morgan, Jr 61 P.3d 460 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984); P.2d 222 (1985).
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
State v. Van Adams 984 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1999
The state can make that showing through the use of extrinsic evidence, including “a certified copy of a judgment of conviction.”
State v. Ysea 956 P.2d 499 Ariz. 1998
State v. Ysea 956 P.2d 499 Ariz. 1998
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
State v. Hyde 921 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1996
State v. Lee 917 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1996
State v. Lee 917 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1996
705 , 126 L.Ed.2d 671 (1994); , , , cert denied, 471 U.S. 1143 , 105 S.Ct.
State v. Jackson 918 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1996
State v. Jackson 918 P.2d 1038 Ariz. 1996
1197, 1207 , 51 L.Ed.2d 393 (1977); , cert.
State v. Gonzales 892 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1995
State v. Gonzales 892 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1995
1359 , 94 L.Ed.2d 530 (1987); , (close proximity to murder victim supports grave risk circumstance).
State v. Rosas 904 P.2d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Rosas 904 P.2d 1245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Vickers 885 P.2d 1086 Ariz. 1994
State v. Vickers 885 P.2d 1086 Ariz. 1994
State v. Wood 881 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1994
State v. Wood 881 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1994
State v. Rebollosa 868 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Rebollosa 868 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Quick 868 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
State v. Quick 868 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993