Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Nash, 694 P.2d 222.

406 citing documents.

State v. Herrera, Jr. 859 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1993
State v. Herrera, Jr. 859 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1993
State v. Landrigan 859 P.2d 111 Ariz. 1993
State v. Landrigan 859 P.2d 111 Ariz. 1993
(unexpected or accidental death during course of or flight from robbery will not support aggravating circumstance of pecuniary gain).
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
State v. Hill 848 P.2d 1375 Ariz. 1993
State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
State v. Salazar 844 P.2d 566 Ariz. 1992
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); , , cert.
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, defendant must prove (1) that his counsel lacked minimal competence as determined by prevailing professional norms, , and (2) that counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced the defense
State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
State v. Cook 821 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1991
3047 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990); , (defendant robbed co-worker and another victim at gunpoint, then shot the latter); , (defendant shot employee at coin shop, then stole $600; court found “plan to rob and a murder which furthered that plan”), cert.
State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
State v. Greenway 823 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
State v. Engram 831 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Engram 831 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Webster 824 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Webster 824 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Huffman 820 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Huffman 820 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
State v. Lavers 814 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1991
State ex rel. Neely v. Sherrill 815 P.2d 396 Ariz. 1991
State ex rel. Neely v. Sherrill 815 P.2d 396 Ariz. 1991
State v. Jackson 821 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Jackson 821 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. West 812 P.2d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. West 812 P.2d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Valdez 806 P.2d 1376 Ariz. 1991
State v. Valdez 806 P.2d 1376 Ariz. 1991
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
State v. Comer 799 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1990
PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW In capital cases, we independently review the sentence to determine whether “the sentences of death are excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases.” , , cert.
State v. Lucas 794 P.2d 1353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Lucas 794 P.2d 1353 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Webb 793 P.2d 105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Vaughn 786 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Vaughn 786 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Romanosky 782 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1989
State v. Romanosky 782 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1989
State v. Waitkus 778 P.2d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Waitkus 778 P.2d 1283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); , , cert.
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
(applying to cases tried or pending on appeal on or after January 9, 1985), and (2) was there a “reasonable probability that but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different,” the prejudice requirement.