Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Nash, 694 P.2d 222.

406 citing documents.

State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
To decide this claim, we look at (1) whether counsel’s performance was reasonable under the circumstances of the particular case, , , cert.
State v. Smith 774 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1989
State v. Smith 774 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1989
prived of effective assistance of counsel at trial because of his trial counsel’s failure to: (1) request a proximate cause instruction on felony murder; (2) object to the prosecutor’s argument concerning felony murder; and (3) receive an instruction defining “knowingly.” To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that counsel’s performance was deficient, , , cert.
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim in Arizona, a convicted defendant must prove that (1) counsel lacked minimal competence as determined by prevailing professional norms, , , cert.
Andrews v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona 770 P.2d 397 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Andrews v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona 770 P.2d 397 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. White 770 P.2d 328 Ariz. 1989
State v. White 770 P.2d 328 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Jonas 780 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Jonas 780 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Adams 765 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1988
State v. Adams 765 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1988
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), , cert.
State v. Byrd 772 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Byrd 772 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Rankovich 765 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1988
State v. Rankovich 765 P.2d 518 Ariz. 1988
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Befford 754 P.2d 1141 Ariz. 1988
State v. Befford 754 P.2d 1141 Ariz. 1988
State v. Broughton 752 P.2d 483 Ariz. 1988
State v. Broughton 752 P.2d 483 Ariz. 1988
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL Defendant contends that trial counsel was ineffective under the standards enunci *399
State v. D'AMBROSIO 750 P.2d 14 Ariz. 1988
State v. D'AMBROSIO 750 P.2d 14 Ariz. 1988
It was alleged that trial counsel was under the influence of alcohol and was ineffective during much of the time he was representing D’Ambrosio
State v. Sammons 749 P.2d 1372 Ariz. 1988
State v. Sammons 749 P.2d 1372 Ariz. 1988
State v. Nirschel 745 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1987
State v. Nirschel 745 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1987
State v. Williams 800 P.2d 1240 Ariz. 1987
State v. Williams 800 P.2d 1240 Ariz. 1987
and find no reason to reconsider our analysis.
State v. Tallabas 746 P.2d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Tallabas 746 P.2d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Reasoner 742 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Reasoner 742 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Santanna 735 P.2d 757 Ariz. 1987
State v. Santanna 735 P.2d 757 Ariz. 1987
In order to prevail on an ineffective assistance-of-counsel claim, a defendant must establish that his counsel’s performance was deficient, , , cert.
State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
State v. LaGrand 733 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1987
State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
cert., denied, 471 U.S. 1143 , 105 S.Ct.
State v. LaGrand 733 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1987
State v. Fisher 730 P.2d 825 Ariz. 1986
State v. Hudson 730 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1986
State v. Hudson 730 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1986
State v. Fisher 730 P.2d 825 Ariz. 1986
State v. Tyrrell 733 P.2d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Tyrrell 733 P.2d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); , cert.