Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Silva v. De Mund, 299 P.2d 638.

41 citing documents.

Tamara Camila Rivero Quinteros v. Anthony Celaya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
Tamara Camila Rivero Quinteros v. Anthony Celaya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
(“[T]his court must assume the trial court found every controverted issue of fact necessary to sustain the judgment and, if there is reasonable evidence to support such 11 CELAYA v. RIVERO QUINTEROS Opinion of the Court
Francine C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Francine C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lund v. Lund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lund v. Lund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Fuentes, 209 Ariz. at 58, ¶ 32 (); ().
Cross v. Elected Officials Retirement Plan 325 P.3d 1001 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cross v. Elected Officials Retirement Plan 325 P.3d 1001 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Elliot, 165 Ariz. at 135, 796 P.2d at 937
Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
(“If the facts are undisputed, [appellate court] will direct the rendition of the correct judgment.”); Henderson v. Las Cruces Prod.
Marriage of Elliott v. Elliott 796 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Marriage of Elliott v. Elliott 796 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Westberry v. Reynolds 653 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Westberry v. Reynolds 653 P.2d 379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Engineers v. Sharpe 573 P.2d 487 Ariz. 1977
Engineers v. Sharpe 573 P.2d 487 Ariz. 1977
Chudzinski v. Chudzinski 546 P.2d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Chudzinski v. Chudzinski 546 P.2d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Batesole v. Batesole 535 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Central Park Mobile Homes 529 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Central Park Mobile Homes 529 P.2d 711 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Ellingson v. Sloan 527 P.2d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Ellingson v. Sloan 527 P.2d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Bud Antle, Inc. v. Gregory, 7 Ariz.App.
Fleming v. Becker 483 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Fleming v. Becker 483 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Biddle v. Girard 462 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Biddle v. Girard 462 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
* * [Since findings of fact and conclusions of law were not requested, made or stated, this Court must ‘view the record as though the trial court had found every controverted issue of fact necessary to support the judgment’, , ‘and, if there is reasonable evidence to support such findings, hold that it did so correctly.’
Glubauer v. Smith 458 P.2d 532 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Glubauer v. Smith 458 P.2d 532 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Contractor & Mining Service & Supply, Inc. v. H & M Tractor & Bearing Corp. 417 P.2d 542 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Contractor & Mining Service & Supply, Inc. v. H & M Tractor & Bearing Corp. 417 P.2d 542 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
hed, since findings of fact and conclusions of law were not requested, made or stated, this Court must “view the record as though the trial court had found every controverted issue of fact necessary to support the judgment”, , “and, if th^-e is reasonable evidence to support such findings, hold that it did so correctly.”
Boies v. Cole 407 P.2d 917 Ariz. 1965
Boies v. Cole 407 P.2d 917 Ariz. 1965
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County 406 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise County 406 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Gabitzsch v. Cole 386 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1963
Gabitzsch v. Cole 386 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1963
Daru v. Martin 363 P.2d 61 Ariz. 1961
Daru v. Martin 363 P.2d 61 Ariz. 1961
decided after the promulgation of Rule 63, this Court stated: “ * * * Certainly, while a succeeding judge cannot weigh evidence that was taken before his predecessor and decide facts, there is no reason why he may not use such facts found by his predecessor in perfunctorily rendering the appropriate j
US Manganese Corporation v. Schuster 323 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1958
US Manganese Corporation v. Schuster 323 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1958