Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lee, 689 P.2d 153.

176 citing documents.

State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
2689 , 86 L.Ed.2d 706 (1985), and (2) whether there exists a “reasonable probability that but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” , (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 693 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Smith 774 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1989
State v. Smith 774 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1989
State v. Lee 772 P.2d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Lee 772 P.2d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
The large number of pre-sentence incarceration days resulted from the granting of a new trial after conviction, , and the second prosecution which resulted in the present sentence.
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
State v. Carver 771 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
2689 , 86 L.Ed.2d 706 (1985)
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
2689 , 86 L.Ed.2d 706 (1985); , see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Nirschel 745 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1987
State v. Nirschel 745 P.2d 953 Ariz. 1987
disapproved on other grounds, Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Cartwright 746 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1987
State v. Cartwright 746 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1987
157 *314 (1984), citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Santanna 735 P.2d 757 Ariz. 1987
State v. Santanna 735 P.2d 757 Ariz. 1987
2689 , 86 L.Ed.2d 706 (1985), and that his counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced his defense, -14 , -57 (1984).
State v. LaGrand 733 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1987
State v. LaGrand 733 P.2d 1066 Ariz. 1987
State v. DeNistor, 143 Ariz. at 413, 694 P.2d at 243.
State v. Fisher 730 P.2d 825 Ariz. 1986
State v. Fisher 730 P.2d 825 Ariz. 1986
State v. Edwards 739 P.2d 1325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Edwards 739 P.2d 1325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 506 Ariz. 1986
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 506 Ariz. 1986
2689 , 86 L.Ed.2d 706 (1985); , see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Moyer 727 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Moyer 727 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Castaneda 724 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1986
State v. Castaneda 724 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1986
State v. Schrock 719 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1986
State v. Schrock 719 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1986
2689 , 86 L.Ed.2d 706 (1985)
State v. Mount 719 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Mount 719 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
The applicable test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two parts: (1) whether counsel’s performance was reasonable under prevailing professional norms, , and (2) whether there is a reasonable probability of a different result.
State v. Bush 714 P.2d 818 Ariz. 1986
State v. Bush 714 P.2d 818 Ariz. 1986
2689 86 L.ED.2d 706 (1985)
State v. Escalante 714 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Escalante 714 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Long 714 P.2d 465 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Long 714 P.2d 465 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State v. Hackworth 716 P.2d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Hackworth 716 P.2d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Anderson 710 P.2d 456 Ariz. 1985
State v. Anderson 710 P.2d 456 Ariz. 1985
State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
State v. Lucas 708 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1985
State v. Borbon 706 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1985
State v. Borbon 706 P.2d 718 Ariz. 1985
State v. O'Connor 703 P.2d 563 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. O'Connor 703 P.2d 563 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985