DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lee, 689 P.2d 153.

176 citing documents.

  • State v. Shedd 703 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Shedd 703 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Paul 703 P.2d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Paul 703 P.2d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
  • State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
    The second prong of our ineffective assistance of counsel test requires that there be a “reasonable probability that but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” , (quoting Strickland v. Washington, supra, — U.S. at-, 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Parris 696 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Parris 696 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
  • State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
    (adopting second prong of test set out in Strickland v. Washington, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Roscoe 700 P.2d 1312 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Roscoe 700 P.2d 1312 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Meeker 693 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Meeker 693 P.2d 911 Ariz. 1984
    The test for ineffective assistance of counsel in Arizona is now a
  • State v. Carriger 692 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Carriger 692 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1984
    (adopting the test for prejudice set out in Strickland v. Washington, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Goswick 691 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Goswick 691 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1984
    In State v. Lee, we held that defendant must not only show that his attorney acted with less than minimal competence but must also show that “there is a *586 reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceedings would have been different.”
  • State v. Noriega 697 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Noriega 697 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Vasquez 690 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
  • State v. Vasquez 690 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Gillies 691 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1984
    we set forth the standard by which claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are measured.
  • State v. Noleen 688 P.2d 993 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Noleen 688 P.2d 993 Ariz. 1984
    We adopted the Strickland standard, which places the burden of showing the prejudice that results from ineffective assistance of counsel on the defendant, , [1984].