Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite MacNeil v. Perkins, 324 P.2d 211.

104 citing documents.

Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa Inc 416 P.3d 824 Ariz. 2018
¶35 cited by Amicus and the dissent, also does not support the existence of a general off-premises duty.
Hatch Development, LLC v. Solomon 377 P.3d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hatch Development, LLC v. Solomon 377 P.3d 368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Compton, ().
Taylor-Bertling v. Foley 313 P.3d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Taylor-Bertling v. Foley 313 P.3d 537 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
See Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Compton, , (finding negligence per se can apply only where statute “provide[s] that a certain thing must or must not be done”)
DeLoach v. Alfred 952 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
DeLoach v. Alfred 952 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Welch & , , 8 * , (2) the plaintiff is part of the class of persons that the statute was designed to protect, , (3) the violation of the statute is either unexcused or inexcusable, Brannigan, 136 Ariz. at 517 , 667 P.2d at 217 ; and (4) the violation
Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Superior Court 870 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Superior Court 870 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Third, one of the elements of an attractive nuisance is a condition “the possessor knows or has reason to know and which he realizes or should realize will involve an unreasonable risk of death or serious bodily harm to such children.” Restatement § 339(b); , -16 (1958).
Ocotillo West Joint Venture v. Superior Court 844 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Ocotillo West Joint Venture v. Superior Court 844 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Shanks v. Davey Tree Surgery Co. 845 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Shanks v. Davey Tree Surgery Co. 845 P.2d 483 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Because of the risk of serious injury from contact with electric wires, power companies have a duty to exercise a reasonable degree of care in maintaining their power lines, Salt River Valley Water Users’ , rev’d on other grounds, , and to take precautions whenever it can reasonably anticipate that people will come into contact with its lines.
Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. Kelly 800 P.2d 962 Ariz. 1990
Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. Kelly 800 P.2d 962 Ariz. 1990
Bruce v. Chas Roberts Air Conditioning, Inc. 801 P.2d 456 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hibbs v. Calcot, Ltd. 801 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hibbs v. Calcot, Ltd. 801 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
(absent prior decision or statute to contrary, Arizona courts will follow Restatement of the Law whenever applicable).
Brown v. Arizona Public Service Co. 790 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Brown v. Arizona Public Service Co. 790 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
THE PARTIES’ , which neither side argued to the trial court, disapproved Compton to the extent Compton required attraction onto the defendant’s property by the very instrumentality that constituted the attractive nuisance.
Rodriguez v. Schlittenhart 780 P.2d 442 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Rodriguez v. Schlittenhart 780 P.2d 442 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
overruled on other grounds
Webster v. Culbertson 761 P.2d 1063 Ariz. 1988
Webster v. Culbertson 761 P.2d 1063 Ariz. 1988
Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’
Moore v. Tucson Electric Power Co. 761 P.2d 1091 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Moore v. Tucson Electric Power Co. 761 P.2d 1091 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
See Salt River Valley Water Users’ , overruled on other grounds
Aztlan Lodge No. 1 v. Ruffner 745 P.2d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Aztlan Lodge No. 1 v. Ruffner 745 P.2d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Co., 24 Ariz.App.
Papastathis v. Beall 723 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Papastathis v. Beall 723 P.2d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Tomasits v. Cochise Memory Gardens, Inc. 721 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Followed Tomasits v. Cochise Memory Gardens, Inc. 721 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Bank of America v. J. & S. AUTO REPAIRS 694 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1985
Bank of America v. J. & S. AUTO REPAIRS 694 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1985
Fendler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., , Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Co., 24 Ariz.App.
Moran v. Klatzke 682 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Moran v. Klatzke 682 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Mahan v. First Nat. Bank of Arizona 677 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Mahan v. First Nat. Bank of Arizona 677 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
324 * (in the absence of contrary controlling law, the Arizona courts will follow the Restatement of Law).
Green Acres Trust v. London 688 P.2d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Green Acres Trust v. London 688 P.2d 658 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Co., 24 Ariz.App.
Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co. 652 P.2d 507 Ariz. 1982
Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co. 652 P.2d 507 Ariz. 1982
” Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n v. Compton, , overruled on other grounds
Fendler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 636 P.2d 1257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Fendler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 636 P.2d 1257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Co., 24 Ariz.App.
Jesik v. Maricopa County Community College District 611 P.2d 547 Ariz. 1980
Followed Jesik v. Maricopa County Community College District 611 P.2d 547 Ariz. 1980
Barnum v. Rural Fire Protection Co., 24 Ariz.App.
Sullins v. Third & Catalina Construction Partnership 602 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979