Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sweet, 693 P.2d 921.

202 citing documents.

In re 1986 Chevrolet Corvette 905 P.2d 1372 Ariz. 1994
In re 1986 Chevrolet Corvette 905 P.2d 1372 Ariz. 1994
State v. Buhman 887 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Buhman 887 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Our supreme court specified in Larson that the obligation to harmonize related statutes “applies even where the statutes were enacted at different times, and contain no reference one to the other____” Larson, 106 Ariz. at 122 , 471 P.2d at 734 ; -71 , -26 (1985) (Statutory ambiguity may be retroactively relieved by a clarifying subsequent amendment.).
Matter of Beren 874 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1994
Matter of Beren 874 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1994
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JD-6236 874 P.2d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JD-6236 874 P.2d 1006 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
Gibbons v. Superior Court 873 P.2d 700 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
Gibbons v. Superior Court 873 P.2d 700 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Goulder v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF TRANSP., MOTOR VEH. 868 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Goulder v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF TRANSP., MOTOR VEH. 868 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
E.C. Garcia & Co. v. Arizona State Department of Revenue 875 P.2d 169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa County 875 P.2d 150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa County 875 P.2d 150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(legislative intent can be derived from development of statute).
Goulder v. Arizona Department of Transportation 868 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Goulder v. Arizona Department of Transportation 868 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Business Realty of Arizona, Inc. v. Maricopa County 870 P.2d 1125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Business Realty of Arizona, Inc. v. Maricopa County 870 P.2d 1125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
(if uncertain as to meaning of term within statute, court resorts to rules of statutory construction).
In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person MH 91-00558 854 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person MH 91-00558 854 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
Wiley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 847 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1993
See, -70 , -25 (1985); Senor T’s Restaurant, 131 Ariz. at 362-63 , 641 P.2d at 850-51
State v. Arana 843 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1992
State v. Arana 843 P.2d 652 Ariz. 1992
For example, , 272 n. 2, , 927 n. 2 (1985), we noted that the amendment which gave rise to today’s version of § 13-702(H), , in which we held that a defendant found guilty of an “open-end” offense may be placed on probation for a longer period
Peterson v. Superior Court 842 P.2d 1350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Peterson v. Superior Court 842 P.2d 1350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
§ 13-3404(B)(2), repealed by 1987 Ariz.Sess.Laws 967, 986; -72 , -27 (1985); -56 , -85 (App.1987).
Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior Court 839 P.2d 1093 Ariz. 1992
Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior Court 839 P.2d 1093 Ariz. 1992
Co., , -71 , -26 (1985).
Tracy v. Superior Court 810 P.2d 1030 Ariz. 1991
Tracy v. Superior Court 810 P.2d 1030 Ariz. 1991
(statutes must be construed in view of the purpose they are intended to accomplish and the evils they are designed to remedy).
State v. Takacs 819 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Takacs 819 P.2d 978 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Janson v. Christensen 808 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1991
Janson v. Christensen 808 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1991
Alexander v. Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System 804 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Alexander v. Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System 804 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Carrow Co. v. Lusby 804 P.2d 747 Ariz. 1990
Carrow Co. v. Lusby 804 P.2d 747 Ariz. 1990
State v. Wagstaff 794 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1990
State v. Garza Rodriguez 791 P.2d 633 Ariz. 1990
State v. Garza Rodriguez 791 P.2d 633 Ariz. 1990
See, , (when determining legislative intent, court may consider both prior and subsequent statutes in pari materia).
State v. Lammie 793 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Lammie 793 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hibbs v. Chandler Ginning Co. 790 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hibbs v. Chandler Ginning Co. 790 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
City of Prescott v. Town of Chino Valley 790 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
City of Prescott v. Town of Chino Valley 790 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by