Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Borbon, 706 P.2d 718.

109 citing documents.

State v. Hartwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Hartwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
The superior court need not “conduct evidentiary hearings based on mere generalizations and unsubstantiated claims[.]”
State v. Garland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Garland Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(“Rule 32 does not require the trial court to conduct evidentiary hearings based on mere generalizations and unsubstantiated claims that people exist who would give favorable testimony.”); ¶ 17 (App. 2000) (explaining that a colorable claim requires the defendant to “pr
State v. Kashkool Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Kashkool Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(“Rule 32 does not require the trial court to conduct evidentiary hearings based on mere generalizations and unsubstantiated claims that people exist who would give favorable testimony.”).
State v. Rowan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Rowan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Such grounds exist if “there is sufficient evidence to indicate that the defendant is not able to understand the nature of the proceeding against him and to assist in his defense.” ().
State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Campos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-400 (1985) (explaining courts need not conduct an evidentiary hearing based on mere generalizations and unsubstantiated IAC claims).
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Nye Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Nye Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
To survive summary dismissal of such a claim, a defendant must raise in his or her petition “some factors that demonstrate that the attorney’s representation fell below the prevailing objective standards.” (recognizing that “[p]roof of ineffectiveness must be to a demonstrable reality rather than a matter of speculation” and courts are required to give effect to a presumption of competence absent contrary evidence in an “unsupplemented record”).
State v. Dillion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dillion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Donald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Donald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Begay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Begay Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Hon. brain/hu 422 P.3d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Hon. brain/hu 422 P.3d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
the defendant struck the door of a cashier booth with a tire iron so violently the cashier thought the bulletproof glass door might break.
State v. Benjamin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Benjamin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Marlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Marlin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Bunescu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Bunescu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Patton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Leininger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Christie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Christie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
–400 (1985) (superior court need not conduct an evidentiary hearing based on generalizations and unsubstantiated claims of ineffective assistance of counsel).
State v. Leininger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-400 (1985) (holding trial court need not conduct an evidentiary hearing based on mere generalizations and unsubstantiated claims of ineffective assistance of counsel).
State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶10 Accordingly, a defendant’s petition must raise “some factors that demonstrate that the attorney’s representation fell below the prevailing objective standards.” (“[p]roof of ineffectiveness must be to a demonstrable reality rather than a matter of speculation;” courts required to give effect to presumption of competence absent contrary evidence in “unsupplemented record”).
State v. Harmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Harmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(trial court need not conduct an evidentiary hearing based on generalized and unsubstantiated claims of ineffective assistance of counsel); (ineffective assistance of counsel must be a demonstrable reality rather than a matter of speculation), abrogated on other
State v. Barriga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Barriga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Bolin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Bolin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Sovero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017