Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. LaGrand, 733 P.2d 1066.

133 citing documents.

State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Strayhand 911 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Strayhand 911 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Lang 862 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Lang 862 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Berger 828 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Berger 828 P.2d 1258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Although the supreme court has stated that it is “the better rule, particularly in capital cases,” to inform a defendant of the potential for enhanced punishment, , cert.
State v. Schaaf 819 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1991
State v. Schaaf 819 P.2d 909 Ariz. 1991
a. Right to counsel It is well-settled that “a defendant is constitutionally entitled to representation by counsel or to proceed without counsel if he so chooses.” , cert.
State v. White 815 P.2d 869 Ariz. 1991
State v. Conroy 814 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1991
State v. Conroy 814 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1991
State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Conroy 797 P.2d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Conroy 797 P.2d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Schad 788 P.2d 1162 Ariz. 1989
State v. Marlow 786 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1989
State v. Marlow 786 P.2d 395 Ariz. 1989
State v. Stevens 764 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1988
State v. Stevens 764 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1988
State v. Hudson 763 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1988
State v. Hudson 763 P.2d 519 Ariz. 1988
State v. Ault 759 P.2d 1320 Ariz. 1988
State v. Ault 759 P.2d 1320 Ariz. 1988
17, 18.1(b), 19.1(b)(2); -88 , -71 , cert.
State v. Jobe 757 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Jobe 757 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Reid 747 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1987
State v. Reid 747 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1987