Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Britz v. Kinsvater, 351 P.2d 986.

84 citing documents.

Susan J. v. Dcs, S.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Susan J. v. Dcs, S.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Paul v. Dana B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Paul v. Dana B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Joel M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Joel M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“Inasmuch as the trial court’s findings of fact are not themselves challenged by this appeal, we may assume that their accuracy is conceded.”).
Joshua W. v. Dcs, F.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Joshua W. v. Dcs, F.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tabatha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tabatha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jean K. v. Jeremy M., J.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jean K. v. Jeremy M., J.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Suzanne S. v. Dcs, F.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Suzanne S. v. Dcs, F.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Angelette J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Angelette J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Diana R. v. Dcs, I.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Diana R. v. Dcs, I.E. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Christopher L. v. Ades, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Christopher L. v. Ades, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(assuming that the trial court’s findings of fact are conceded when a party fails to challenge them).
Bostwick v. Jasin 821 P.2d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Bostwick v. Jasin 821 P.2d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Credit Finance, Inc. v. Bateman 660 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Credit Finance, Inc. v. Bateman 660 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Downs v. Ziegler 477 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Downs v. Ziegler 477 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
246 P. 1038 (1926) ; , 185 P. 361 (1919).
Moore v. Mark 475 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Moore v. Mark 475 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Grady v. Price 383 P.2d 173 Ariz. 1963
Grady v. Price 383 P.2d 173 Ariz. 1963
In such case, the intent to exact usury is presumed.”
Merryweather v. Pendleton 367 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1962
Merryweather v. Pendleton 367 P.2d 251 Ariz. 1962
modified on rehearing, , , 185 P. 361 (1919).
Sulger v. Maslin 365 P.2d 1113 Ariz. 1961
Sulger v. Maslin 365 P.2d 1113 Ariz. 1961
989 , 137 P. 555 , , , to wit: “ Tn deciding whether any given transaction is usurious or not, the courts will disregard the form which it may take and look only to the substa

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by